>just talk to her >just be alpha LMAO

Just ignore feminists

thats all creepy beta stalkery shit lmao

take my advice or don't - talk to them as a friend/mate after then get her number

dont fucking follow her
dont use pickup lines
and dont do it at a comic shop
fucking hell I knew 4channers were beta but didnt know it was this bad for real

guy who escalates that she's attracted to = strong and confident sexy man

guy who escalates that she's not attracted to = creep, rapist, pig ,etc.

>Laurie Penny
Why would anyone try to talk to her even?
She hates men and is a bitch in general

>>38731620
kek I only saw the first one, but still take my advice although this bitch is a crazy feminist cunt

There's a difference between a real girl and a bat shit fucking insane feminazi that makes up stories online to further her agenda.

>>38731630
This is the proper way to address her

https://youtube.com/watch?v=oj9dA6E3fJw

>>38731674
Why can't wymen wait for their turn to talk EVER?

Talking to girls is fine. Continuing talking to them after it's clear they don't want to talk to you is absolutely retarded. If she's not interested, then just leave her alone. It's not a difficult concept.

A fact:
If you think any of those interactions are ok and she's just a crazy feminist, you're definitely creepy.

>>38731674
Oh its this girl holy shit i fucking hate this bitch. Biggest self entitled feminist I've ever witnessed. I can guarantee more than 90% of the things in the OP are made up

>>38731578
These interactions are the product of an unusual amount of male creepiness and an unusual amount of female bitchiness and do not reflect the average interactions between a man and woman.

File: 2016-09-16 10.17.17.png (646KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 1080x1920px

>>38731622
This is true. It's the same as if a really hot girl approached you and went "hey, wanna fuck?", Or if an ugly fat one did, you wouldn't react any differently. Thank the lawd for my facial aesthetics leading to basic bitch tinder conversations like these

>>38731578
literally who

>>38731674
fucking rekt

>>38731622
Well, no shit. You don't escalate unless you read her cues as positive. And if, once you're escalated, she doesn't seem happy about it, you stop and dial it down a notch. It's not rocket science. The problem is autists escalating because "the book/youtube vid/4chan/whatever says so" and not because the other person is responding and flirting back. Then they get pissy and whine online because an uninterested woman didn't want to be groped by a stranger and therefore she's Stacy and CHAD will fuck her with PIZZA and so forth.

>>38731973
Exactly what I was thinking, but she's verified on twitter so she must be a big time celeb

>>38731578
Confession: I actually like her work in the 'New Statesman'. She's eloquent, argues well, has that nerdy humour. Not very analytical, but an entertaining read anyway.

>>38731578
>adverse

Uhh, isn't this cunt a writer?

>>38732139
Fuck off and die please laurie

>>38731779
She's clearly making them seem worse than they really are.
College girls at my local uni shitpost about how they feel at a threat of rape when near the dudes that hang around the campus.

>>38731674
I knew I recognized that bitch's face from somewhere.

This bitch is making it all up

people like this needs be ostracised, not hit on.

>>38732139
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raKrmpLcgvI

It's embarrassing how they can give such a childish person with no clue in the world about politics a platform. Especially at 1:45 but really every time she opens her mouth.

Maybe you guys should try not being ugly

>>38732400
"No clue" = I disagree with her

There is no political debate on this site. You either parrot the conservative/right-wing consensus or you get called some equivalent of "cuck" or just dismissed in some other way. This does not bother be, as it's not the proper platform. It's a fitness site, for gods's sake.

(Also, Peter Hitchens is an arch-idiot. His own, brilliant, brother couldn't stand him. He's good at repeating stuff that conservatives belive and has no real, original view of his own. Just my view, though.)

>>38731674
Based. As. Fuck.

>>38732400
>when are we going to stop taking care of each other and stop pointing the finger at each other
>spoken after she pointed the finger every time she was asked to speak
I understand they called her in to be part of the voice of the "youth" due to the major schism between the age groups from the referendum, but was there seriously nobody else they could've gotten to represent that side?

>>38732518
I mean the fucken Daily Mail, m8? Aren't you fucken embarrassed? Peter Fucken Hitchens... Jesus Christ....

>>38731622

Really, this. You won't know which one you are until you try, but women will EXPECT you to already know.

>>38732518
You really think using game of thrones analogies is fitting for brexit? Do you think that wether the UK should be in the EU or not is arguing about where a "tiny slice" of of power is located? A tiny slice?

I hardly see how he parrots what conservatives believe when he's against what the conservatives do. Or what conservatives are you talking about?

>>38731674
Her voice is adorable
Too bad I can't absorb a single word of what british people say so I don't know what's this about

>>38732586
It was a pop-cultural analogy that wasn't very fitting, but that does not invalidate her entire view or her as a person. It's more than a tiny slice, to be sure, and she kind of drops the ball in not presenting or at least mentioning the Leftist oppositions to the EU that exist (and they do). Again, I'm in disagreement with her on this point but again it does not invalidate her entire view or her as a person. It's possible to diagree with people on lots of stuff and still enjoy their writings and agree on some stuff, or even enjoy being challenged by their writings; I myself am I socialist but enjoy reading Hayek for instance.

Sorry, conservative but right of Tories. He's sort of a "proper conservative" and doesn't like the Tories whom he feels aren't real convervaties. It's not uncommon, the "not conservative enough" sentiment on the Right. You have it in the US as well, with people wanting the Republicans to go more right-wing.

>>38732546
https://youtu.be/-2z-AdzgKjY?t=69

>>38732653
I've seen her more than once and she's not come across as intelligent. This was an example and I don't really think that just saying "well here she's wrong but sometimes she's right" is a good argument. Of course it's possible to disagree on some thing and still enjoy their writing if it's intelligent but she certainly doesn't come across as intelligent.

And of course leftists that oppose the EU exist, that should be the reasonable socialist point to take. The new labour aren't very socialist and the new tories aren't very conservative. I suppose I'm also parroting this subset of conservatives in saying this, or perhaps some subset of socialists. What he says doesn't get a very big voice in the media so I certainly don't mind him saying it, and from what I've seen he fares well in arguments which leads me to believe that he does have a standpoint of his own. Of course it's similar to people who agrees with him, that's generally how ideologies work.

>>38732781
Didn't say she "was right", just that I enjoy her work in the New Statesman. Not familiar with her other stuff, but the NS stuff is well-written and makes me think.

Being SIMILAR to what others say is not the same as parroting; my impression is that Peter parrots. Never found his arguments convincing, but he's a good enough orator.

>>38731886

>hawt

Are you trying to fuck a 14 year old?

>>38731578
>nerdy jewish public schoolgirl who got bullied so hard in high school she became anorexic and tried to kill herself
she's pretty much the female equivalent of /fit/cels honestly