Does the type of calorie matter?

>>38679814
>what weighs more, a pound of lead or a pound of feathers?

>>38679814
>You guys always say Calories In Calories Out (CICO)

Don't lump me in with those faggots. Anyone who possesses a shred of common sense will clearly understand.

No, eating 500 cals of cake != 500 cals of chicken

The macros will be different
The micros will be different
The satiety will be different
The insulin response will be different
The way you feel afterwards will be different

For the sake of argument, yes if you eat only 1000 calories of sugar you will 'lose fat' but you won't gain any muscle, you will feel like total shit and become a skinnyfat leftist nu-male cuck

Eat your meat, dairy, vegetables and fruit like a human being was meant to do.

>>38679877
>what makes a better pillow 1lb of lead or 1lb of feathers

>>38679814
I don't know a lot about the subject but it makes sense to me that the protein you'd get from chicken would help preserve muscle mass more than cake and ice cream

Not to mention if you "cut" on cake and ice cream then you're a fucking retard

>>38679938
Does the chicken cross the Pound of lead or the Pound of feathers

>>38679877
Depends, how much DNP is on the pillow?

>>38679938
What is even your argument?
Strictly for fat loss in the scenario OP suggests fat loss would be the same. Yes, appetite will different, energy would be different, mood will be different but not fat loss, if the regimen is stricly adhered to.

It's not about what's preferable, just what's possible.

>>38679985
My argument is, yeah eating 500 Cal of ice cream will result in the same amount of weight gain/loss, but why eat the shit when you dont have to.

Just in case:
lead =ice cream
feathers = chicken

>>38679985
well fat loss will also be less on the cake diet because you lose more muscle mass without protonz in your diet, but lose the same overall weight

if you lift weights a diet of ice cream and cake will cause a big loss of muscle mass. that would fuck your entire "progress" up. if you include enough protein however, the difference would be much smaller or nonexistent
for someone physically inactive there is practically no difference

You will lose the same amount of weight, not necessarily fat.

Your macro spread and the exercise you do determines the make up of your body. The guy eating chicken and broccoli will have more muscle on him than the cake guy simply because he has the protein stores to repair muscle that gets lightly damaged in every day living. Not to mention his hormonal response would be more beneficial to muscle growth due to the greater presence of micronutrients and protein.

If, however, you were to ensure that protein intake would be the same between the two people, then things get a little trickier, and this is where the IIFYM argument comes into play.

>>38680014
I understand, I just think you kinda missed the point of the question OP was asking. He's not asking ''What is preferable'', he's asking ''Is it possible'', which it is.

>>38680014
>being retarded enough to think the problem was that you didn't explain your moronic metaphore enough

>>38679926
Thread should end here, but instead this will go on for 200+ replies.

>>38680060
I didn't think that was the problem friend, just spicing up my shit post. Perhaps the problem is getting frazzled over what someone says on an anonymous anime cave drawing forum.