How do I get all 4?

>>38393795
Daily undulating periodization.
http://strengtheory.com/the-bogeyman-of-training-programs-and-why-it-may-be-just-what-you-need/

>>38393795
wtf is the difference between strength and power?

>>38393818
Power is 1rm, you stupid fucking nigger

>>38393812
Does not planning my routines besides what exercises I'm doing, and deciding my set and rep ranges each day count as undulating periodization?

>>38393825
No power is W/t

>>38393825
Is this bait

>>38393827
no

>>38393818
Strength is moving as much weight as possible.

Power is moving as much weight as possible, in the shortest possible time.

Think Deadlift compared to Power Clean.

>>38393825
r u dum?

>>38393818
power is explosive

>>38393896
>>38393872
No and no

>>38393890
Why not? It's basically the same thing. Strength days, hyperthrophy days, overload days. The only difference is, I don't plan mine in advance, which makes it even more undulating than if it were planned.

>>38393909
>Power is defined as the ability to generate as much force as fast as possible. Strength is the amount of force a muscle, or group of muscles, can exert against and external load.

http://humanfitproject.com/fitness-workouts/longevity/whats-the-difference-between-power-and-strength/

>Strength is the ability of your nervous and muscular systems to produce enough internal force in your connective tissues and muscles to move an external force, such as weight or your body against gravity. Unlike power, strength requires no quick movements to produce force nor does it take time as a factor for work.

www.livestrong.com/article/507621-differences-between-muscular-strength-and-power/

>Strength is known as a consistent, slow, exertion of force over a period of time. Power is similar to strength, but it includes one other dimension: Speed.

http://wiseandfit.com/fitness/strength-vs-power-whats-the-difference/

>Strength is the amount of force a muscle, or group of muscles, can exert against an external load -- a barbell in the case of weight lifting or an opponent in football. Power is force developed quickly and combines strength and speed.

http://livehealthy.chron.com/differences-between-muscular-strength-power-3281.html

>“Strength is the ability to move a certain amount of weight, whereas power is the ability to move weight quickly. To give a simple example: Performing a deadlift involves a strong base of strength, whereas a movement like the snatch requires explosive power."

http://www.mensfitness.com/training/pro-tips/fit-5-power-performance


First 5 goddamn results on google you stupid nigger

Or maybe just learn basic terminology.

>>38393818
All strength is power, but not all power is strength. It's just like squares and erectangles.

>>38393939
"""NO"""

>>38393842
>>38393896
>>38393900
>>38393939
makes sense, ty
But that makes me wonder, wouldn't power vs. strength be somewhat independent of how many reps you do?
Wouldn't it be more about how you perform the exercise?

>>38393977
Doesn't matter because it's all just broscience my friend

>>38393972
Oh sorry, I didn't realise that you meant '''''NO'''''. I thought you just meant no. Now that I know you are using caps and apostrophies, I guess you must be right.

>>38393994
Man, you're fucking dumb as shit

>>38393795
What happens at 7 reps?

File: rep ranges.jpg (118KB, 877x727px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 877x727px

>>38393795

>this image

>>38394039
Why doesn't 6 or 7 reps do anything?

>>38394039

>i do 7 reps because of this image

>>38394036
You lose all your gains

>>38394062
clearly 9 reps is the optimal number

>>38394039
I do 6 reps per set
Am I doomed?

>>38393812
YES I FUCKING HATE FREE STUFF
FUCK OFF FOR THE 100TH TIME YOU PIECE OF SHIT

>>38393812
>http://strengtheory.com/the-bogeyman-of-training-programs-and-why-it-may-be-just-what-you-need/

oof, i think he needs to expand on the theory beyond one study

training status of subjects

and then finishing off with
>Several other studies have shown similar results, but the study groups weren’t large enough to reach statistical significance (often a problem in training studies).

Of course, to be honest about the data, there is one study showing that block periodization may be slightly better than DUP under certain circumstances.

doesn't "Slay" anything but disprove anything he typed up before that

>>38393795
The guideline rep ranges afaik are
Strength 1-5
Power 12-20
Endurance 20+
Hypertrophy (I recall from studies on this subject) occurs at any rep range as long as you lift until failure.

>>38394159
>Hypertrophy (I recall from studies on this subject) occurs at any rep range as long as you lift until failure.

Im sorry but that's bullshit

>>38394159
no,

the time and type of movement is AS important as load/volume relationship.

STR = force x distance
POWER = force x distance / time

power = low rep "high" weight at a relative speed therefore, lower rep scheme 1-3 for 1 single movements vs 3-5 for repetitive movements

6-8 for strength (3-5 minute rest)

8-12 for hypertrophy adaptation (1 minute rest)

15 - 20 for endurance with minimal rest inbetween

>>38394159
no
power 1-3 (done as fast as possible)
Strength 3-6
hypertrophy 7-12
Endurance 15+

File: Rep-Ranges.png (42KB, 1008x1008px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1008x1008px

>>38394189
No.

>>38394047
Cause the image is made by someone who thinks its funny.. you really believe that's real?

>>38394217
Where does it say anything about lifting until failure?

>>38394217
from the gist of reading the article based on his undulated model of training, it seems that he is not very concise on what he means and how he says it. Almost to a point where it is misguided.

There are theories, studies and then there are CONSENSUS of things.

gotta take all 3 with a grain of salt but its more "tried and true" with consensus of things

>>38394217
also on hypertrophy, campos et al 20000 specifies that there were NO hypertrophic results in 20-28 rep scheme

so anything above 11-12 (including failure) is no gains

>>38394010
>Is dumb
>Calls someone else dumb