LOL so true

REALLY FUCKING MAKES YOU THINK HUH?!

This is /pol/ level of shit posting

Haha LOL!!!!

>>38193323
>>38193327
2/10 made me reply

>this is what filthy casuals believe

>>38193348
Please lurk more.

Everyone underestimates just how intense exercise has to be to make up for eating only kinda sorta healthy, much less even touching junk food diet tier.

>>38193323
Haha I know right Anon? Can't believe I got stuck with slow metabolism. :,^(
Hey wanna go pick up a caramel mocha frappucino tomorrow morning? I need that shit to get through the morning you know~ Been thinking about trying that new Chinese place down the road too

File: 1460053907066.jpg (101KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 625x626px

OP made a cancer thread, abandon or contract at your own risk.

@Allyssa Simmons so us

>>38193323

I'M REALLY THINKING NOW

>>38193323
>>38193327
THIS IS SO INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGING THAT IT FORCES ME TO CONTEMPLATE

File: Superhans.jpg (21KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x300px

>>38193348
>>38193435
>>38193474

File: 1346423014029.png (134KB, 900x891px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 900x891px

>>38193323
>>38193327
it's sad how many people actually believe this

File: 1470202284540.jpg (57KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 600x800px

>>38193323
>>38193327
Quit it

>>38193637
well it's actually true. There's many factors, like height, weight, age, health.

I'm 1.96 m tall and 100 kg and I eat as much as my sis who is 52 kg and 1.62 and I actually GAIN weight with how much she eats, while she remains thin / even loses weight, went from 57 to 52 in like a few weeks.
To lose weight consistently, I have to eat, BY THE NUMBERS, 8-900 calories a day.
I also work a physically engaging job (load trucks with metallic bars 20-70 kg each)

>>38194303
There is no fucking way you could gain weight at 1k calories a day unless you have an INCREDIBLY RARE disorder.

I have friend who complains he is a hard gainer but when he says he has eaten a lot on a whole day it is something I can have for breakfast.

>>38194485
No disorder lets a 100 kg man gain weight on 1000kcals/day. Period.

He's either lying or stupid.

>>38194303
There's absolutely no way your body breaks the laws of physics and creates more energy out of nothing. You are not eating the amount you think you're eating.

>>38194485
Per day I eat as follows:

2 bananas - 180 calories
1 peach - 60 calories
~ 150g cheese - 570 calories
OR
chicken breast, some 200-250 g - 300-370 calories
maybe a tomato / lemon / orange / something as a small snack, 40-60 calories

That's about what I eat a day. If I, for some reason, eat s soup or so, I don't eat anything else for the rest of the day.
My daily intake is 800-1k a day maximum, depending on what I do.

>>38194716
>2 bananas
>180 calories

Pick one

>>38194725
A normal banana has about 90 calories if it's not too big.

>>38194303

There is no way that this is true. At your height and your weight, also depending on your sex, your BMR is either as a female: 1875 cal a day; or, as a male: 2265 cal a day. If you're eating less than 900 calories a day, then you're not even eating enough to maintain basic bodily functions or even enough to maintain a productive energy level throughout the day. You either suffer from anorexia or you're a total fucking liar.

>>38194804
>or you're a total fucking liar.

Ding ding ding.

>>38194716
Add coffees/alcohol/ other shit you drink to what you eat and see how much it adds up.

Fyi american cofees have stupid calories, like 500 and up.

>>38193323
>>38193327
How can this artist be okay with being so unoriginal. I've seen this same comic so many times by different artists.

>>38194862
you expect every piece of art ever to be 100% conceptually original...?

>>38194303
But also you're an idiot so it might explain your weight gains. Apparently stupid people get obese more often.

>>38194872

I expect them to be not 100% conceptually beaten to death.

>>38194890
kek

how ignorant and pretentious can someone be

>>38194716
fucking lying moron

>>38194862
>>38194872
guys can we please stop calling it art before things get a bit too out of hand

>>38193323
What did he mean by this? Wow it really makes you think.

>>38194534
>the laws of physics

This is really stupid reasoning.

Your metabolism is a complex system.

Sure, 99% of people who eat below their BMR will see results, but 'the laws of physics hurrr' is just dumb. Like, you do realise that nuclear fission fits pretty nicely with the laws of physics? Thus every individual ATOM of the food you eat contains enough energy to level a city.

Obviously our bodies don't work like that, but you're still retarded and bad at thinking.

>>38195053
If /fit/tards ever overtook the natsoc guys in society for power and made a /fit/soc society. People like you would be put into camps.

>>38194534
Few things

1.The body uses calories at different efficency levels
2.The body doesn't just burn energy to live and move. It also needs it to fight off infection, think, and even keep you warm.

Simple as.

>>38194883
I never said I gain weight. I lose weight consistently, 3-5 kilograms a week with this diet.
I only said I gain weight IF I EAT AS MUCH AS MY SIS DOES, while she doesn't gain the same weight that I do.

Jesus fuck, reading comprehension on /fit/ fits the stereotype. Stupid fucking meatheads.

>>38195053
Nuclear weapons don't defy physics nor do they prove that your metabolism can. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it follows magical rules. Also if an individual atom could level a city then the nuke that detonated in Nagasaki would have destroyed all the cities.

>>38195138

Yeah, you're crashing your metabolism by doing what you're doing. You're going to either kill yourself or ruin your body losing weight the way you're losing it.

>>38195053

>Your metabolism is a complex system.

Yea, and we know exactly how it works, which is in no way related to
>nuclear fission
radioactive decay or splitting atoms.

>Obviously our bodies don't work like that.
Yea no shit. So your post does... nothing?

Energy ( available calories) in / out is a very simple, observable biological process. It works within the confines of thermodynamics.

>>38195189
>Yea no shit. So your post does... nothing?

Except demonstrate your poor reasoning.

But your continued demonstration of such will do just fine on that front.

>>38195133

1. which can be roughly calculated by age / height / sex / activity levels to a degree of accuracy to create a BMR.

2. This is included within the BMR calculations.

If you are trying to loose weight, people suggest a calorie deficient diet of several hundred calories to catch those small nuances and ensure you are under the BMR.

>>38195172
Bitch we aren't nukes.
The calorie in vs calorie out is only a thing if you're fucking starving to fucking death or you're morbidly obese.

For everyone else, we're a bit more complex.

UP to a point? Yeah calories matter. But you can not sit there and tell me that eating 1500 calories of pure cane sugar is the same as eating a balanced diet of meat veg and the occasional fruit.

>>38195242
>hurr durr i can't figure out how energy 1 is the same as energy 2

>>38195053
Is this bait? How can someone browse /fit/ and still know this little?

>>38195215

Explain to me again how we should abandon the basic principles of energy calculation within biology.

Maybe you could try draw a parallel between nuclear decay and splitting atoms again for us all, or you could go back to eating glue.

>>38194534

>law of physics fatass IIFYM summerfag from india

If he burns 900 calories a day and eats 1000 calories he will gain weight.

It's as simple as that pajeet.

The law of thermodynamics didn't say everyone has 2000-3000+ TDEE, it just says eating past your TDEE(whatever it is) makes you fat/muscular.

Your indian education is really bad, stick to call centres and not lifting.

>>38193323
>>38193327
lol this is me, spot on OP

File: 1457002042340.jpg (157KB, 921x741px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 921x741px

>>38194716
Nah

It's possible to eat too much and not get any weight if you have any medical issues or maybe some sick parasites.

The other way around, however, is not possible.

The only possibilities are that you either fucked up your counting or that you're eating far too much without thinking about it. Take a look at Secret Eaters on youtube and you'll soon realize what you've certainly been doing.

If you want to really tackle this, here are some ground rules:
> Everything that's eaten must be written down
> EVERYTHING even a fucking candy
Your eyes are stupid because you're a stupid fat fuck, so you can't be trusted to judge food, if you could you wouldn't be fat, so
> use a fucking kitchen scale for objectivity

You seem to be going all down in your guesses, as well. That's not how you guess at this kind of thing. If you must guess, guess up - less odds of error. But it's better not to guess at all.

>>38195233
BMR calculators are at best a vague guess that works a lot of the time.
Secondly, that has FUCK ALL to do with any thing I've written.

Peoples bodies work at different rates depending on a whole host of factors. Simply stating that a calorie is a calorie is just something for junk food addicts hide behind and retards to parrot.

>>38195242

It is assumed people know not to eat a diet of pure cane sugar or similar.

To be using this as a condition to your argument is unreasonable.

>>38195251
You're retarded and worse, you don't know why.

>>38194804
> anorexic and fat
This meme must die. There are no fat anorexics. Maybe some fat bulimics, but no fat anorexics.

>>38195288
Except that he isn't burning 900 calories a day

>>38195310
No it is not unreasonable.
It is following the logic of that mindless saying that is squealed by tens of millions of idiots.

>>38194716
He said he eats a lemon as a snack lmao, this bait is too good.

>>38195320

You seem to be saying the best rule of thumb doctors have for the mass general public is garbage because a clown like you might want to eat 1500 calories of cane sugar or Starbucks latte?

Why are you on /fit/?

>>38195320
1500 calories of cane sugar has as much energy as 1500 calories of fruit and veg.
I think you're the type of person that incorrectly answers the "which one is heavier, a ton of bricks or a ton of feathers?" question.

>>38195343
Yeah, but bricks are heavier than feathers.

>>38193327

>Half a M&M
>a M

It's AN M&M, retard.

>>38195242
>But you can not sit there and tell me that eating 1500 calories of pure cane sugar is the same as eating a balanced diet of meat veg and the occasional fruit.
But are talking about gaining/losing weight or general health? For the first one, I can absolutely say that 1500 Calories of anything will change your weight about the same.

Of course, 1500 Calories of fucking sugar is not much at all and you'll have a lot of trouble maintaining such a "low calorie" diet for long. Additionally, it does not include too many nutrients, we need variety, so that's not really good for your health either.

However, if one stuck to the diet, the expected weight changes would happen all the same. So while being healthy takes more work, controlling your weight is all about Calories In and Calories Out.


It's an unnecessary distinction, however, as the people who complain about calories are all the fat fucks who only eat candy and starbucks and get 4k+ Calories of it every day.

>>38195343

While the energy values are identical...the guy has a point although i doubt he knows the reason why.

The endocrine system will process them differently and at different rates. The pancreas will freak out, flood the body with insulin and try store all that sugar as fast as possible as fat cells.

But this is not an energy making system, prolonged diets of pure sugar under your TDEE will not magically make you fatter and fatter.

>>38195342
Find one fucking doctor or nutritionist who says " A calorie is a calorie" without caveats or mean it.

>>38195343
No, a correct analogy would be do you want to eat 400 calories of eggs or do you want to drink 400 calories of gasoline.
A calorie is a calorie after all.

>>38195371
>For the first one, I can absolutely say that 1500 Calories of anything will change your weight about the same.

No.
No it will not.
That's what this entire fucking thing is about.
A calorie is not just a calorie.

You will lose weight if you eat less you will gain if you eat more? That basic simple statement is true.
But your body will absolutely revolt against you if you use the wrong kinds of calories and the type of and amount of mass lost and gained will change depending on what you eat.

This is basic fucking knowledge.

>>38195451
Considering I can't digest gasoline, I'm going to go with the eggs.

>>38195451
>No, a correct analogy would be do you want to eat 400 calories of eggs or do you want to drink 400 calories of gasoline.
I doubt the body can make use of the energy in gasoline. I'd rather eat 400 calories of eggs instead of sugar for various reasons, reasons that aren't "my body defies physics".

>>38195385
...
You're forgetting body composition and how the metabolism changes based on how you eat.

With a diet like that they MIGHT lose weight, but their body composition not even mentioning their health will be horrid.

>>38195310
>>38195371
Except you guys are wrong and he is right. Basic principles of insulin. Thermodynamics/cico is literally dr. Oz mom-tier fitness advice. Telling someone "your diet is as simple calories in, calories out. iifym!" Is the basic equivalent to telling someone "only use the elliptical to get toned, if you lift weights you will get too bulky!"

For you cardiofags who don't see the problem here, what I mean is yes, your advice is based on facts and has a tiny ring of truth to it, but it is also the most rearded advice you could possibly give to someone who is asking about diet and nutrition, yet it is almost always the first words parroted by the people on /fit/.

Coincidentally, the majority of /fit/ are a bunch of fat DYEL neckbeards, so this never surprises me.

>>38195484
But a calorie is a calorie? Isn't it?

>>38195515
>MIGHT
No, will. They will lose weight, replace any source of your normal energy intake with the calorie equivalent amount of sugar and you will lose or gain as much weight as you were before the change.

>>38195524
Yes, the energy in the gasoline doesn't cease to exist because reasons.

File: this is what fat people actually believe.png (425KB, 2488x1776px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 2488x1776px

>>38195519
That's already taken into account as a difference in Calories in/Calories out, you fucking dumbass, regardless of how it's processed

If you're too retarded to figure out the calories out, that's your problem

>>38195524
So your theory is that the body doesn't properly digest eggs as it does sugar which is why you would get fatter eating sugar?

>>38195524
A calorie is a unit of energy.
If the body isn't using that energy, the term is meaningless to the discussion.

Food is used as energy, Gasoline isn't.

>>38195545
That's fucking stupid.

Different calories have different effects on your body at different times. Your metabolism will speed up or slow down depending on what you eat or how much you eat and might even do everything it can to keep weight.

Calories in vs calories out is something people hold onto because it's fucking simple and it allows a lot of leeway in how they eat.

It's also deeply misleading and is used as a way to get people to eat absolute garbage or lie to themselves about how much energy they are consuming and worse not care or know about the types of food they are consuming.

I had a ex that would constantly tell me how she ate like shit and loved food. She'd go on and on about how she ate more than anybody and didn't do anything to work it off and still looked good.
>she actually ate like a little bitch. Would have a cookie or two and some other bullshit snacks and think it was a feast. Tfw she found out just how much chicken, rice and broccoli I ate on a daily basis

File: tmp_19628-1465118858329504436249.jpg (97KB, 640x454px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 640x454px

>>38193323

>>38195595
Oh, you're one of the retards that thinks calories reset every day.

For the sake of any ignorant people lurking that might have been infected by this bit of idiocy, calories in/calories out works over long periods of time, not just in the short term.

Unless you have severe digestive problems, a calorie will be taken into account over time, regardless of how quickly it is metabolised, provided you stick to your caloric limits.

>>38195586
No, the discussion is clearly stating that a calorie is, no matter what, a calorie and the laws of dynamics and all of that stupid bullshit they know fuck all about.

>>38195595
This. Its so fucking simple. Cico is pushed by coca cola, nestle, kraft, etc.. They want you to eat their shit and feel good about it. I've NEVER met an actual fit person (over the age of 18) who believes in this bullshit.

Dude, just stop arguing with them. I've tried for years. They are the most thick-headed, stubborn lot you'll ever argue with. After all, you are threatening their junk food, and anything that threatens their american freedom is immediately heresy.

Let them roll on, eating according to their macros, let 34% of them (and steadily rising) be obese. Since, you know, cico is working so damn well for the burgertards. After all, its simple science, right?

>>38195632
No, you're trying to come up with every excuse in the book and using retarded analogies to justify it.

>>38195595
>Your metabolism will speed up or slow down depending on what you eat or how much you eat and might even do everything it can to keep weight.
Your metabolism does not induce fission or whatever retarded process you think takes place that means energy can be created from nothing.

>>38195625
Are you fucking kidding me you stupid fucking cunt?

This isn't about day to day. This is about every day.
Even if you stretch it over weeks and months it's still going to be the same shit.

Are you absolutely fucking retarded?

>>38195640
There is no excuse, I will use no more analogies.
A calorie is not just a calorie.
Every single doctor, nutritionist, and scientist you can find says the exact same thing. The only people who are sticking to this, are fucktards who don't know any better and junk food/fast food shillers.

>>38195650
Your metabolism is also not a 100% efficient system you goddamned retard.

If it was we would have died a long goddamend time ago.
Do you realize where you are right now?
What the biggest things people want to know here?
How to raise the metabolism.
How to make the body use excess energy.
How to make the body as energy inefficient as possible.
That includes eating certain kinds of foods. Get it?

>>38195717
>Your metabolism is also not a 100% efficient system you goddamned retard.
Where does this not utilized food energy go?

>>38194510
An impacted bowel would but then he'd explode from all the low calorie soda he drinks

>>38195739
The food energy is all utilized, but the problem is that it's not utilized in the way that you think.

People simply spout calorie in calorie out.
Without actually thinking about it.

What do you mean "out"
Exercise?
Living?
Excretion?
Defacation?

A massive chunk of energy is spent simply to keep the body warm.

That's not even mentioning how the metabolism changes because of what and how much is eaten as well as how active the body is and emotional states.

Calorie in and calorie out is true. But only if you want to lose ANY amount of weight or gain any amount of weigh tno matter what it looks like or affects your health.

That is the problem with it.
It's short sighted lazy and is used to talk naive people into "diets" and eating trash as long as it's under a certain amount of calories.

>>38195739
Have you ever shit before in your life?

>>38193481
Underrated kek

File: 1458699689597.png (440KB, 921x741px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 921x741px

>>38194303

>>38195795
Nigga there is no difference between 100kcal of sugar and 100kcal from veggies
The health problems you mentioned come from lack of vitamins and minerals which aren't in sugar, but plenty in vegetables, fruits, etc., the calories give you the same energy

>>38195874
>Nigga there is no difference between 100kcal of sugar and 100kcal from veggies

That's 100% incorrect.
And you are fucking stupid for posting that shit and not knowing why it's fucking stupid.

>>38195894
Then enlighten me my friend

File: 1469716735244.png (72KB, 283x268px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 283x268px

>>38195894

Sorry to but in on your conversation, but for weight loss purposes he is 100% right and you are fucking retarded.

>>38195905
Do I really have to tell your dumbass how and why 100 calories of sugar and 100 calories of veggies are different?

>>38195795
>The food energy is all utilized
If it is all utilized then the energy value of veggies is the same as sugar.
The only way your shitfit can make any sense is if you can explain what it fucking is about "healthy" food that the fucking unit of measurement that is the calorie isn't appropriate for vegetables because it doesn't reflect the fucking energy that the body gets from them, unlike with sugar.

Just explain where this energy goes that makes vegetables and sugar not energy equivalent. Do you shit it out unprocessed? Does a pixie magic it out of your stomach?

>>38195926
Yes, if you make a claim you have to provide proofs to support said claim, no?

>>38195894
like >>38195912 says it doesn't matter in terms of weight loss

If you want to be 'healthy' then obviously it matters

>>38195934
>What is calorie density

>>38195949
What does it have to do with what i posted?

>>38195912
>>38195926
>>38195934
>>38195940
>>38195944
Fine. I will start posting links ALL of the links to the relevant information.
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/27/science/la-sci-calories-20120627
http://healthyenough.net/calorie-counting/
http://home.trainingpeaks.com/blog/article/a-calorie-is-not-a-calorie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_calorie_is_a_calorie

By the way, the study that said a calorie is a calorie no matter what? Yeah, they lost weight but the have no idea what was actually lost during that trial. AND every single bite down to the last spoonful was calculated precisely.

I reiterate. Calories in calories out only really works for weight loss if you're starving or morbidly obese.
>>38195949
Something that doesn't fucking matter. My point is the source of the fucking calorie is important not how many calories there are per mouthful.

>>38196121
>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_calorie_is_a_calorie

All the research pointed to in that article is awful. None of them actually took into account the differences in physical activity. Obviously the people eating healthier foods are more likely to exercise and be more active. But that doesn't mean you can eat unhealthy foods and lose the same amount.

>>38195608
>salad dressing

I'm pretty sure there'smore calories in the food she listed because of that.

File: collage12.jpg (275KB, 1381x961px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 1381x961px

>>38195595
>>38195637
actual fit person over 18 who believes in this bullshit here
>stay fat/mad

>>38196568
there's still even more calories in all of asia-girl's food than fat-girl's salad dressing.

>>38196637
Do you eat """junk food"""? How old are you?

What's your favourite flavor of ice cream?

>>38196704
i probably eat a bit of junk food every other day or several times a week, but I respond immediately by beginning a fast. I'm turning 20 in october. cookie dough or anything peanut butter

>>38196767
you have good taste in junk food

>>38195367

This is a heroic post.

>>38193327
omg lol me IRL

>>38194846
>Fyi american cofees have stupid calories, like 500 and up.

A starbucks shake is not coffee. A latte is not coffee. An Al Pacino is not coffee.

Eight ounces of black coffee is less than five calories anywhere on earth, even at Starbucks, even at McDonalds. Stop drinking white bitch syrup desserts. You duncecap troglozoid.

Source: I drink more than a pot a day and get shakes + chills + vomiting if I have less than 200mg of caffeine in 24 hours.

>>38195608
lol I love how the whale who threw this is so bitter she had to make the asian a racist as fuck stereotype as well

>>38194303
I'm not gonna explain why you're wrong, I'm just gonna call you what you are, which is a fucking retard. You god damn fucking retard.

>>38193327
>>38193323
hmm really makes me ponder

>>38196637
Posting a steroid addled faggot who's obviously on fat burners.

The fucker can eat any goddamned thing and lose weight. But for natural people who want to be healthy and lose weight relatively quickly and look good. Knowing that a calorie is not just a calorie is the right way to go.

>>38196527
Fucking retarded.

>>38194303
>less than 1K calories
Suuuure.

>>38193327
> this what macrofags believe and it used to worry me

>>38195288
>I only burn 900 cal/day!!!

do you know what BMR is?

File: 1466192529787.gif (971KB, 270x252px) Image search: [Google]

971KB, 270x252px

holy shit, this thread is fucking cancer.

>>38193481
Underrated

File: 1344844395251.gif (1MB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 240x180px

>>38197848
yup

>>38195874
Aint you familiar with glycemic index?

>>38198081
kek is this shit still around seriously ?

>>38198122
Sure why not

File: image.jpg (978KB, 2414x3061px) Image search: [Google]

978KB, 2414x3061px

>>38195637
>>38195595

>mfw the past week I have been eating the same exact thing every single day and look like this

>breakfast
Geek yogurt granola
Naked juice
2 Nutella sandwiches
Poptart

>lunch
Easy mac
Ham and cheese hot pocket

>dinner
More Nutella sandwiches
Pistachios

Calories are calories faggots get off you're ass

I eat like fucking shit and still am shredded 24/7

>>38196637
This guy knows what's up

>>38196637
Mirin' kunt, fatties stay mad such as below
>>38197477
just lol. It's so easy to tell who hasn't even hit 1-2 years of proper lifting/diet/gains. So many bitter fat fucks on here god damn.

Fat burners!? Jesus christ he's not even below 12% body fat you don't need to use fat burners to do that. Just stop stuffing your face.

Stay mad fatties

>have problems keeping on weight when younger
>start taking mirtazapine
>start gaining weight
>stop taking mirtazapine
>still able to tack on weight

>>38197070
Congrats you're addicted to caffeine.

File: 1410350757090.png (301KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1000x1000px

>>38193323
>>38193327

I came here to post this
>>38195299

>>38193323
>tfw on anti-psychotics
>tfw low test
iam losing weight and ive been lifting but i look notable less defined and have pretty bad gyno any other schizos here that are actually buff?

>>38198888
i'm a schizoid if that counts

File: rock.png (255KB, 600x2150px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 600x2150px

>muh laws of phyiscsdynamics
>man eats 5k calories a day
>loses weight

UHHHH /fit/TARDS?

>>38196637
Which roids are you cycling?

>>38195385
Yeah it'll get stored as fat immediately. So what? Our bodies burn fat ALL THE TIME. It's still the same amount of energy.

>>38199108
He also worked out like 3 times a day.

The secret is The Rock is roided to all fuck too

>>38199108
>1200$ for one person
I hope that's just because NY is expensive as shit

>>38193323
The ayce buffet I go to has crab legs and sushi. A mountain of crab legs and a roll.of.sushi don't make.you fat.
>mfw I see the fat people pigging out on greasy chow mein
fat people are so stupid they'll pay 25$ to pig out on a 10$ panda express meal. This is why fat people are fat, they'll find a way to be a fat person no matter where they go.

>>38194303
>mfw this is my sister and mom
>mfw it used.to be me
>mfw I could've also ended up like this poor delusional fatty.
So glad I got my shit together and got fit. So many examples of what could've happened. BTW, you're delusional

>>38194716
the fucking cheese is what gets me. it's not the bare amount, but proportionately, you're saying your diet consists mainly of cheese on some days. what the fuck?

>>38194716
>570 Cal worth of cheese in one sitting.
Jfc you are most definitely a fatass
You have hardly in fiber and I see no vegetables. And you eat 570 Cal of cheese in one sitting apparently. You obviously haven't even read our fucking sticky you dumb delusional twat

>>38195186
I guarantee you she has no muscle other than the ones she used to wipe her ass. Her bmr will drop because fat Burns a lot less calories per volume than muscle does. Her body will for the most part not touch fat reserves if Shes truly eating 800 cal

>>38195302
That difference is only a few hundred calories at most though. Its not enough to.explain that 200+lb fat chick.

>>38197070
And a European wouldn't consider the mud you drink go be coffee either.
>Im addicted to a shit tier substance, so listen to me!
Yeah, no.

>>38199322
>You should stop eating too much cheese
>wow just wow.
Nice argument liberal.

>>38195314

Read a book faggot. The physical symptoms of anorexia don't manifest themselves until later. If a person who is 6'4" and 220 lbs and only eating 900 calories per day to lose 5-6 kg then they more than likely have an eating disorder. Bulimia is characterized by binging and purging, which if you fucking read any of this thread is not mentioned. I know you're on 4chan, but that's no excuse for being a retard.

>>38194716

You're just eating a shit-load of cheese as the majority of your diet? No wonder you're gaining weight, you probably haven't taken a shit in months.

File: FUCK.png (102KB, 746x717px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 746x717px

>>38200358
>>38194716

>Being literally this full of shit

As much as I hate the oversimplification, some people are more prone to becoming obese, or are more resistant. However, what that comic doesn't show is that the girl had a one off cheat meal, but she usually is in the gym for an hour and a half each day, whereas lard ass forgot to mention that he ate 3 bags of chips, some chicken wings and a 2L bottle of coke daily, along side his precious chocolate things.

>>38195608
>LEAN chicken
>salad with dressing on the SIDE
>WATER

so much fucking denial

This thread:
149 replies of cancer
84 tumors posting
>10/10
Good job OP

>>38193323
>>38193327
Most people here are calorie in- calorie out proponents. While the body can be more or less modeled as a simple machine like this, there's various things that can occur to modify burn rates.
Thyroid hormone is largely responsible for your metabolic rate (more TH = higher rate). In excess it can lead to muscle wasting, if scarce it can lead to human ambulocetus syndrome.

That terrible joke aside, other things that can directly lower metabolic rate (and the converse increases it) are: low cortisol, low HGH/ insulin like growth factor
Indirectly: vasopressin, dopamine, aldosterone, renin, angiotensin II, and other such things modify vasodilation and water filtration rates among other things which can reduce metabolism and or pack on water weight.
The insulin-glucagon interplay for sugar regulation also has a pretty big weight in the matter.

All that being said, basically everything that would decrease metabolism is encouraged by a sedentary lifestyle that is high in fat and sugar consumption. Placing increased metabolic demands on your body increase the basal rate, and also make the body significantly more efficient at processing sugar. I recall reading about how marathon runners have something 10x the energy from the same amount of sugar as a sedentary individual, but I can't find the source on that right now.

Basically, our bodies do obey the laws of thermodynamics and, in general, calorie in- calorie out does a decent approximation of weight gain/loss. But, metabolic demands are extremely different based upon activity levels, mostly because physical activity boosts the hormones that stimulate muscle production (and fat is difficult to lose without aerobic exercise).

>>38195299
>If you have parasites
Why are people so fucking stupid? Let's say you have a parasite in you (tapeworm) and it's eating food. Do you think that the tapeworm inside you and the food you eat that it consumes magically doesn't fucking weigh anything? It absolutely does, you'll still gain weight. The only difference is now some of the weight is from the tapeworm instead of bodyfat or muscle mass.

>>38195632
Except that the calories listed on your food nutrition facts is NOT THE AMOUNT OF CALORIES YOUR BODY WILL METABOLISE IF YOU EAT IT YOU DIPSHIP
It's a theoretical amount based on the numbers of fat, carbs and prots in your food. We KNOW how much calories there are, but we DON'T KNOW how many of these your body will absorb. If you disagree with what I've just said, you're proving your ignorance.

Very easy example : protein bioavailability. It's the amount of protein your body will metabolise out of the protein contained in a given food. For instance, soy has a very bad protein bioavailability, like 50-60%, and so does raw egg whites. Meaning if you get 100g of protein from one of theses sources, YOU BODY WILL GET LESS CALORIES THAN YOU THINK YOU PIECE OF SHIT

A CALORIE IS A CALORIE ONLY THEORETICALLY YOU MOGOLOID BASTARD

CALORIES ARE AN EXACT CONCEPT USED IN AN INEXACT THEORY, BECAUSE YOU USE THE WORD SCIENCE DOESN'T MEAN IT'S BULLETPROOF OR SIMPLE

>>38195608
>/cgl/ in a nutshell

>>38200852
I mean as far as numbers go , but wouldn't the infected person lose bodyfat? as the tapeworm is taking about macronutrients that the body otherwise would have seen as excess and stored?

>>38193502
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the sentences, the authors grip on the english language is increadible

>>38195608
>1 stick pocky
>small mochi ice cream
>2 small fried dumplings
>small bubble tea
>actual exercise: walking an hour or more every day because owning a car is unrealistic in densely populated Jap cities.

>entire lean chicken
>multiple salads with dressing, croutons, and bacon sprinkles
>actual exercise: 5x1 2lbs dumbell lifts, 10 minutes of low speed, low intensity treadmill then rewarding oneself with smoothie king strawberry hulk

>>38193323
Does someone have the pic that says "what Auschwitzmode faggots say they eat" and then "what Auschwitzmode faggots actually eat"?

File: reJoroC.jpg (14KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 320x320px

>>38194716
>maybe a tomato / lemon / orange / something as a small snack, 40-60 calories

lemon as a small snack . lol ok, that right there is a dead give away that you are a fat fuck, lemon as a snack.. also the cheese. why lie to yourself , no one else believes it .

>>38195608
>exercises done: weightlifting

I guess getting out of a chair can be pretty strenuous

>>38195070
Sieg Heil

File: 1447508995966.jpg (58KB, 378x363px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 378x363px

>>38193327

This is great. We need more cute humor like this on fit.

>>38199241

It is.

so basically, i should just roid

>>38198345
Claviclelet

File: vyFFz3A.jpg (35KB, 297x310px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 297x310px

>>38193327
Would half an M&M just be an 'M'

>>38193327
wtf I hate genetics now

>>38194303
>be me
>bulking at 4.5k calories like a retard
>6'0, 200lbs
>tell that to that female PT at gym
>like 5'2, 120 lbs
>'oh yeah doesn't sound like that much I probably eat more than that, I have a really fast metabolism tee hee'

why are PTs so shit