Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: vahgsahgsahshgsahgs.jpg (105KB, 960x728px) Image search:
[Google]
105KB, 960x728px
Hi guys, i got some time on my week to work out for four days and about 1 and half to two hours each day, and i want to make a training that can fill this time.
I'm thinking about a ABxABxx structure where in the A days i work my chest, back and biceps and in the B days i work legs, shoulder and triceps. I also intend to run on the threadmill for
5 km every work out day (this is very important).
What do you guys think?
>>
File: qascdffdfdf.jpg (87KB, 768x960px) Image search:
[Google]
87KB, 768x960px
bump
>>
File: asasasaasasasasad.jpg (107KB, 768x960px) Image search:
[Google]
107KB, 768x960px
>>
File: nxbxbxbx.jpg (63KB, 526x526px) Image search:
[Google]
63KB, 526x526px
Anyone?
>>
File: asasasassdddfff.jpg (95KB, 900x960px) Image search:
[Google]
95KB, 900x960px
>>
>>38135849
\ssa
>>
4 times a week. You can do a upper / lower body split. Or you can do full body routine every other day or just three times a week on set days. But all of this is just advice. Do whatever the fuck you wanna do.
>>
>>38136232
I was thinking about that too. But, i think that in the lower body days i would finish it too soon, since i was planning to do only 3 to 4 exercise to my legs.
Are 3 to 4 exercises for each group good enough? When i used to work out i did a Push/pull/legs training, six days a weekm and usually was kinda like this.
>>
531 BBB is good for strength and size, and has you lifting 4 days a week, check out blackironbeast.com
>>
>>38136328
Thanks man. i'll check that out
>>
>>38138709
Why it is bad?
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5