Wot? You prefer rice over God-Tier quinoa, anon? When will you learn.

File: Broke.jpg (7KB, 250x167px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x167px

>>38116762

>>38116815
kek

>>38116815
this

File: Amaranth-Collage-S1[1].jpg (77KB, 550x447px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 550x447px

I usually go with amaranth instead. Pop it on the stove, add raisins and pepitas and almond milk, eat it like cereal. Cheaper, tastier, and has a similar nutritional profile.

>>38116898
Ill probably consider it when I start bulking. Seems to be slightly higher in cal and carbs. Has higher minerals than vitamins and vice versa with quinoa. Sucks in the amino acid category. Overall not bad.

>>38117006

>Sucks in the amino acid category

It's slightly better than quinoa

>>38117041
I'm looking at the side by side comparison. Amaranth lacks as a complete amino acid.

>>38117076

You mean a complete protein? How? Quinoa has an AA score of 106, Amaranth is 108

>>38117041
Doesn't have leucine and threonine. Therefore it is an incomplete amino acid.

>>38117098
Protein*

File: amaranth aminos.png (28KB, 452x561px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 452x561px

>>38117098

You might be looking at an incomplete chart that doesn't have full data on its amino acid content

http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/cereal-grains-and-pasta/5676/2

>>38117135
https://www.healthaliciousness.com/nutritionfacts/nutrition-comparison.php?o=20137&t=20002&h=20032&s=185.000&e=246.000&r=174.000

>>38117178

Yeah, that's full of "missing values" meaning they don't have the data. Check the nutritiondata link, they have data for raw amaranth but not cooked for some reason

>>38117217
Maybe cause the hot water nukes all of it? KEK, but will do.