Are homos low test? It depends if they are active or passive?

Is it bullshit?

selfbumb

>>38075983

I have seen muscular fags so I don't think they have low test.

and if they are on roids that's the same as having high test, even if it's synthetic test.

>>38076039

Also my body makes almost no test and I am as perverted towards women as they come.

>>38076039
That makes sense.

>>38075983
I'm a homo and definitely feel the need to get laid/masturbate more than most of the straight men with whom I've discussed the subject. I'm also a top and find big muscular man-asses to be the hottest thing in the world.

>>38076122
Are you passive/submissive? It blows my mind how you can be passive and not low test. Not hating though, just very curious.

>>38076163
He just said he was a top idiot

>>38076196
Oh that's right.

>>38076163
No, 'top' means I'm active, though there are guys who lift like any other dude and prefer to bottom (play the passive role). It blows MY mind that it blows your mind; the extent to which straight men conflate femininity and weakness is quite striking. Also, just because you prefer a passive role in the bedroom doesn't mean you're a passive person; sometimes what draws people to these roles is that they're in direct conflict with how the individual is outside of the bedroom. Tonnes of outwardly manly straight guys are into femdom and cuckold porn and all of that shit, so.

>>38076163
You can be passive and high test, it just fucks with the dirty talk somewhat.

"FUCK ME IN THE ASS ANON, GIVE IT TO ME HARDER, C'MON!"

>>38076258
Yes, but I thought they would be low test too. But nice, haven't thought about in this perspective, thanks.

File: muscular-gay-couple-facebook-sensation.jpg (35KB, 320x500px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 320x500px

>>38075983
You've obviously never seen me fuck. I'm a big hairy mofo, and fuck big hairy mofos. There is nothing low test about two big dudes suckin and fuckin hard.