CICO not working, am I retarded?

>I've eaten more than the app said I should on several occasions

Found the problem

>>37989064
I always made sure that I walked enough that I burned the excess kilojoules I consumed that day. Does that not work?

daily fluctuations, inaccuracy in counting, inaccurate calculation of calories burned during exercise etc.

lots of things can affect your result. the important thing is what happens over longer periods, like weeks/months

>>37989077
Apps always overestimate it. Don't trust their lies.

>>37989090
What should I use instead?

>>37989079
I'm just really keen to lose all this weight as soon as possible as I want to be only a bit fat by summer and be 75 - 80 kg by Juneish.

>>37989145
Don't eat above what they tell you honestly, even if you're burning calories playing Pokemon.

At 120 kg you shouldn't need to worry about eating too little, assuming your goal with this is to attain a healthy bodyweight.

>>37989244
>>37989037
>it's been 3 days why am I not losing noticeable weight
Summer

>>37989145

You kinda have to work backwards. Track the calories you eat, and track your weight. Given those two variables, you can solve for TDEE.

CICO works. The human body literally CAN'T work any other way or it would violate the laws of physics.

>>37989037
Burning off the excess doesn't work. Diet first fitness second.

Also weight loss happens in cycles for a lot of people. You'll lose a ton one week then lose a it the next one then lose a ton again. You want to look at the greater curve of weight loss.