Am I going to die, bros? > 6' 2" > 158 lbs

File: pepe cone.jpg (75KB, 534x806px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 534x806px

you may already be dead

>>37415524
give pic. Handholds can be pretty shit

>>37415524
are those accurate?

File: Fug.png (374KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1280x1280px

>>37415546
>>37415549

They used to just error out for me, I figured after two months of regular lifting I'd have some bodymass for it to actually get a reading with. I'll see about getting a pic.

>>37415524
how the fuck did you get 20.3 sex in your skeletonic state?

>>37415777

Fuck if I know, that's why I was asking

>>37415549
I wouldn't put too much faith in them. My GP used one to measure me a few days ago and it came up with 9.5% bf. He didn't seem surprised but i had my doubts seeing as i have a double chin and no control around sugar. I can even grab a whole handful of fat on my belly.

>>37416260
Can you see your abs?

>>37415524

what do you usually eat in a day?

o_o

>>37415592
definitely not 4% bf, closer to 10% id say

I have been told that they are inaccurate but prove to be an accurate way of measuring change in bf%

ie. it may be wrong, but it is a an accurate way of seeing change in body composition

is this true?

>>37416304
I have fuckall for some sort of calorie tracking system. I probably should get on that. I'm not eating like an anorexic though, I stuff my face pretty regularly and I've been eating very good lately.

>>37416305
Yeah, I figured it was probably wiggin out on me. I think Brad Pitt had like.. 7%? For fight club and he was fucking cut as shit.

>>37416326

ya you should definitely track your calories and nutrients to make sure you're not deficient in any vitamins, minerals, or lipids.

https://cronometer.com/ is pretty useful for that imo :)

>>37415549
No.

>>37416332
Cheers mate, I'll give it a try. Any idea how to factor in some of the more nebulous stuff? For example, I had five plates of sushi (all different stuff) for dinner tonight. How do I even begin to track that?

>>37416286
Absolutely not. I'm assuming im actually between 15 and 20%. I can easily feel them through my belly fat but there's no way to see.

>>37416358

There are quite a few different sushi options which will give you a pretty good estimate or you could work out how much seaweed, rice, and fish/meat you ate from the total amount if you want a more accurate estimate.

>>37416368
Damn, you're not kidding. This is a robust program. I appreciate the tip

>>37416381

no worries man :)

>>37415777
I kekd, underrated post anon, nice one.

Doing a rough estimate of today's activities, it has me at about a 1200 caloric deficit. That's pretty good to know, god damn. And here I thought I was eating a lot. I'm like a reverse fat person fuck

>>37416326
yeah those handheld bf test are usually garbage. Ive heard that they can be up to 8% off