Is this true /fit/?

2 out of 5 of those hoe-bags are fuckable

No.

File: 3250.jpg (4MB, 2592x3888px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2592x3888px

>>37400979
All are acceptable except 2 and possibly 4 as they might be infertile due to obesity and age respectively.

It literally does not matter what women look like, they just exist to carry children and can never be beautiful anyway (no homo)

>>37401001
LOW TEST
O
W

T
E
S
T

>>37400979
>dunkin donuts font
the plot thickens

>>37400979
2 & 4 are grotesque. The rest are fuckable.

>>37400979
2 out of 5 of those hoe-bags will suck your dick like they suck the cream out of a twinkie.

>>37400979

Not good for your heart. Or your joints or your back. Some bodies are fleshy prisons. They are a source of constant physical exhaustion and mental lethargy. Being fat is hell. And I'm not even talking about the judgments of others.

>>37401029

kek

>>37400979
You just know the 2nd from the right will worship your cock.

>>37401001

Literally only the one all the way to the right is fuckable

>>37401142

and the tatted one is hot two but high probability of STDS

>>37400979
Wow, I can't say that I'm really super attracted to any of these females

>n-no homo

I'm honestly more repulsed by someone covered in tattoos than being grossly overweight. Jesus that looks terrible.

Look at the legs on 2, though. Her lack of ankles makes me think she has the beetus and is going to end up as one of those people with rotting feet.

>>37401199

That just like your opinion man

I find her to be the most attractive . There's something about Hispanics/black hair women with tats everywhere that makes me get a massive boner

File: tree man.jpg (76KB, 378x500px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 378x500px

ALL BODIES ARE GOOD BODIES!

>>37401265
Not opening that
Thumbnail itself looks fucked up

>>37401189
1, 3, and 5 can all get it. Not into 2 or 4 tho.

>>37401312

are you 12? tree man was old 6 years ago

>>37400979

>1
ruined by tattoos

>2
Hey if you're drunk and need a fat bitch to fuck

>3
Damn thats a large pelvis, but still fuckable

>4
fuckin nope. just nope.

>5
Doable. And dateable.

>>37401265
Tree people!

>>37400979
pls define good as it is applied here

>>37400979
>no blacks

>>37400979
kek didn't it used to be 'all bodies are beautiful'?

they're moving the goalposts. next it's going to be 'all bodies are bodies'

>>37402124
>all bodies are

antimatter universe discovered
>all bodies
artificial intelligence developed
>all

Any body is a good body, so why mistreat it by being fat?

>>37400979
>dat built semen demon on the right
all of my test

>>37401265
Is that even human?

>>37400979
Number 1 and 3 and somewhat 5 are fuckable, the rest goes straight to the bin.

>>37400979
far right is beautiful.

just like everything else that is far right.

>>37401006
your ancient Greece is showing

>>37400979
at least this time they included thin and/or fit people

>>37401001
agreed. #2 and #4.

>#1 tattoos? no go
>#3 lanklet that is probably infertile
>#5 gross meat butt

#4 though boys.........

Imagine the offspring with that woman. My son would have a 1st class ticket straight to the NFL.

They're all fuckable. Even the fat chicks carry it well enough that they don't have the obvious gross wrinkles, rolls and cottage cheese that many fatties have.

Not saying that I would marry or even date any of those chicks but I would use any of them for fuck buddies.

>>37402747
>>37401265
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidermodysplasia_verruciformis

File: when-you-lose-fat.jpg (98KB, 831x960px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 831x960px

>>37400979
If your body has problems, fix it.

>>37404026
good god man, have some standards

>>37404026
professional photo covers imperfections, you say? My word!

File: image.jpg (43KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x480px

>>37401265