At what BMI does chubby become fat?

>>37364882
Yes

>>37364882
No

I don't know

Can you repeat the question?

>>37364882
Exactly 28.7

>>37364882
I think so

Probably

>>37364882
you ask this in a place where BMI varys widly even among ppl with the same bf% due to diffrences in musclemass?

File: 1438633229504.png (32KB, 213x214px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 213x214px

>>37364882

You mean bf%?

BMI is used to study populations, not individuals.

>>37365557
>>/trash/

>>37364895
>>37365042
>>37365044
>>37365047
>>37365091

I sure hope /fit/ isn't too young to get this.

>>37364882
30% body fat

File: 1445137984730.jpg (125KB, 609x607px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 609x607px

>BMI
>on /fit/

when you have a fold or a sag

>6 feet 63kg is normal
what the fuck

I started at 6 feet 70kg as a complete skelly, I'm now 82 and am only starting to resemble a human being

I'm technically over weight but i'm jacked so haha

>>37365784
BMI literally doesnt apply to anyone who has ever performed any muscle building exercise. The cast majority of lifters, bodybuilders and even rugby players who do a fuck ton of cardio are obese or more. Bf& is the only thing you should go off.

>>37365784
I'm 6'1, 68kg and still skinnyfat

>>37365784
183cm 67,5 kg
I don't look like a skelly imo. Started lifting 3 months ago and I look pretty normal, not like a skelly or muscular, but like you'd expect a healthy person to look like.

>>37365793
fatass

>>37365938

I've been working out for a few years and built a considerable amount of muscle and at 25 BMI i'm still around 18% bodyfat which seems about right.

It's not as simple as "oh if you lift it doesnt apply to you"

>>37364882
26

Aaay lmao, have a bmi of 28 but im not even slightly fat

>>37364882

tfw I'm 193 cm tall and 82 kg and am exactly perfect according to that chart yet I feel like I just escaped Treblinka death camp.

>>37364882

>tfw recovering fatty, looking at this chart
>started out well into "Obese" range
>Still 5 pounds away from "Normal"

File: 1461734546375.jpg (135KB, 592x901px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 592x901px

>>37364882
if im 5'9" at 190 pounds and am at 5 weeks into my work out.. should I wait till im in the normal range before taking creatine?

>>37364882
25

File: 1440947314177.jpg (38KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x500px

>>37367480
>>37367018
>>37365784

If you're training in the gym, you shouldn't aim to be in the "normal range". That's for DYELs.
Muscle mass is also heavy, and BMI completely ignores what is fat and what is lean mass.
See >>37365557
BMI is only used to study populations (because the average person doesn't lift, so they just ignore it), not individuals.

>>37364882
should be like this for men.

ab definition:
pot belly: obese
1 pack (outline) overweight
6 pack: good
8 pack : underweight

File: Justin Lascek 104kg Power Clean & Press in Speedos.webm (2MB, 532x460px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 532x460px

>>37367558

>should be like this for men.

You mean twinks.

File: victor.png (98KB, 200x299px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 200x299px

>>37365784
Viktor Postol is 6' weighs in at 140

>>37367549

I'd disagree. a BMI of 25 with a bodyfat nearing 10% is a good general target for a decent body.

>>37367583
yeah and he's a skeleton

File: Justin pls ugh.webm (1MB, 314x480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 314x480px

>>37367593

>bodyfat nearing 10%

TWINKS OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>37367582
take off about 10 pounds of fat and he'd have a six pack. i stand by what i said.

>>37367610
who is this semen demon

File: How to sex.webm (1MB, 742x480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 742x480px

>>37367616

>wanting to be a weak skeleton twink

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>37367582
Is this meta irony?
I mean, come on, you're a mentally ill faggot, but that just makes you one of many on /fit/, but surely you're not suggesting that bodybuilders are twinks.

>>37367583
>>37367599
retards dont know about weight cutting.

>>37367631
>says the confused weak skeleton.

>>37367631
Aren't you a weak skeleton twink?

>>37367616
overweight is defined as being fatter than what is optimal for health. you're defining overweight as "optimal for aesthetics". those are not the same.

>>37367651
heh, it's still more useful than BMI.

>>37367651
that should be "fatter than optimal for aesthetics", obviously

>>37367660
who cares about BMI in this context? BMI doesn't measure fatness in individuals and was never meant to do so either.

>>37367536
thanks for the chuckle

File: Justin Lascek.jpg (90KB, 393x500px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 393x500px

>>37367634

No one is talking about roided beasts. We're talking about men.

>>37367640
>>37367647

I'm not a man though. ;)

>>37367710
your Y chromosome says otherwise buddy.

>>37364882
>7'
>80lbs

>>37367710
Ya u r fag

>>37364882
>At what BMI does chubby become fat?

At what what, does what become what?

>>37367610
>>37367630
pls respond

>>37367640
>>37367647
>>37367726
>>37367774
>>37367593
>>37367634

You fell for it. He joins a thread showing his wikipedia-level knowledge of some facts, then he starts discussing about what a real men should do in a gym, what's a real man's goal for muscle mass and so on - throwing elementary concepts he did read here and there.
Because reading is all he does. When he's not reading, he's begging for attention. He's longing for your replies each time he's posting chink avatars resembling his twisted perception of the little girl hidden in his anus. He's craving for drama when he links back to his hobbyist site where he pretends to present you with a TL;DR version of training manuals he never tried on himself - always the same couple of variants

>>37368025
>I can't even reverse search and I'm a total newfag
5 posts above yours, filename.
Come on my man.
Hide and report, avatarfagging has been a bannable offence since the dawn of times

>>37368081

Announcing or inciting reports is against the rules of 4chan, summerfriend.

>>37368081

>he's posting chink avatars resembling his twisted perception of the little girl hidden in his anus

Fuck.