/face/ you're nothing without a face post em https://howhot.io

File: stunner.png (191KB, 485x473px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 485x473px

>>36978471
wew lad

>>36978581
also i'm 7 years younger

but can it determine your HEIGHT. and your FRAME.?

>>36978798
Just FACE and AGE

File: reddragon-fiennes1.jpg (28KB, 450x296px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 450x296px

>>36978581

>>36978471
That facial recognition software have fun being on that there database.

File: 1460252435902.png (732KB, 595x555px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 595x555px

>>36978817
delet this

>>36978471
Got hmmm in 10 different pictures, might just lay down and rot today.

Hello NSA

File: douri.jpg (41KB, 515x539px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 515x539px

>>36978471

>>36978600
yea ok mr 29 year old

File: doggu.png (2MB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1600px

>>36978862
really sorry anon

File: good ai.png (176KB, 439x516px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 439x516px

>>36978471
Solid taste

>>36978982
LMAO

>>36978862
Don't worry man

>>36978957
lmao

>>36978982
>>36979124
interesting results here

File: jfmsu.png (129KB, 600x579px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 600x579px

>>36978862
It's bullshit.

File: Screenshot_2016-04-29-22-34-06.png (704KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

704KB, 1440x2560px

B R E H

File: 2.png (129KB, 440x478px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 440x478px

>>36979131

>>36978957
Supreme hahaha

File: 3.png (140KB, 440x446px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 440x446px

>>36979150

File: 4.png (69KB, 505x446px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 505x446px

>>36979162

GOD DAMMIT

File: Screenshot_2016-04-29-21-37-56.png (390KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 1080x1920px

Veni veni veni.

File: fuhrer.png (186KB, 521x517px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 521x517px

>>36979181

>>36979181
the the face of someone who wields a katana

>>36979214
Autism

>>36979214
anon how did you loss your arm

>>36979214
whats that painting in the background called

I got nice on mine. Why even fucking live?

>>36979248
Two Cherubs Reading Detail From Madonna And Child With Saints

File: image.jpg (286KB, 750x1019px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 750x1019px

>>36978471
Lol this site is bullshit. Literally says I would make a stunning drag queen.

File: image.png (418KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 750x1334px

>>36978471

>>36979335
gotta say i agree

File: Hot Ass Abe.png (116KB, 642x526px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 642x526px

Im fucking dying here

File: image.png (471KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 750x1334px

This site is legit

File: 1420002126967.jpg (52KB, 716x724px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 716x724px

>>36978798
Well played

File: Sexy Donald.png (159KB, 536x517px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 536x517px

This shit is dank

File: beforeafter.jpg (265KB, 1040x655px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1040x655px

Rate me
I went from a 3/10 to a solid 8

>>36979214
wtf is that lipstick you huge faggot?

>>36978957

The rodge looks pretty good in this pic no homo

>>36979150

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

>>36979580
I wonder if this guy knows people use his face to shitpost every now and then.

File: sadpug.png (411KB, 565x327px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 565x327px

>tfw it doesn't detect your face

File: We're all gonna make it..jpg (37KB, 564x633px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 564x633px

Filename related.


Site wouldn't detect faces for any of my merchant pics. Pretty badass.

>>36978983
That's godlike? What the fuck.

>>36981555
Yes, it is. She's hot as fuck, Pedro.

>>36979469
Nice.

>>36981559
Maybe her body but certainly not her face, it's ok at best.

>>36981115

do people who say shit like this do it to troll

or are you actually so ugly irl you think he looks good

hes legit fucking demented looking, and only on 4 chan do people say

> no hes actually handsome.

File: lllllll.jpg (66KB, 575x716px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 575x716px

;^)

>>36978862
It doesn't mean shit anon, I got godlike repeatedly and I'm ugly af.

File: Screenshot_2016-04-30-02-06-51.png (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

Seems legit

>>36981609
>20%
This has been asked a million times, but why does no one ever have their phone charged?

>>36979565
UUUU

>>36981619
Its 2 am and im just getting to bed. Charge it when i sleep.

>>36981659
WE WUZ DEM EGYPTIANS, WE BUILT DEM PYRAMIDS

weird program

with stubble/bit longer im stunning consistently

if i shave my facial hair i'm 'nice'.

File: Screenshot_2016-04-30-02-17-50.png (258KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1080x1920px

Stunning baby.

File: q8jkAT8.png (191KB, 676x657px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 676x657px

this site is bullshit

>>36981666
facial hair hides your ugly features prpbably

>>36981680

i dunno if you've old enough to grow facial hair but stubble doesn't really hide anything, it's basically just a shadow.

maybe it highlights my cheekbones and the computer likes that

nfi

>>36981688
stubble hides weak jaw senpai

>>36981700

shrug

means i just keep a slight stubble to look really hot apparently.

ez life ez pussy

>>36981706

Kek

>>36978600
>I'm 7 years younger than 29
I'd have said you're like 32

File: mug.jpg (29KB, 442x484px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 442x484px

>>36978471

File: AI.jpg (71KB, 586x628px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 586x628px

Seems accurate.

>>36978925
Is that the guy that went on a shooting spree?

>>36981829
Yes. Elliot "/r9k/ left the basement" Rogers.

>>36978471
>https://howhot.io
>http://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.07867v2.pdf
>5.1.1 The dataset
>The resulting dataset has 4,650 female users and 8,560 male users. The median age is 25. In total there are 17.33 million ratings, 11.27m by men and 6.05m by women. Interestingly, 44.81% of the male ratings are positive, while only 8.58% of the female ratings are positive. Due to this strong bias of ratings by women, we only predict the ratings of men.
>5.1.3 Results
>We report the average performance across all men’s ratings. Knowing just the image of the person, we can predict 75.92% of the ratings correctly

Just so you fags know, their algorithm is only tested by inputting a picture of a female and predicting the rating of males population in the form of "like" percentage, not the other way around. And only in this case the advertised accuracy is 75.92%.
If you input picture of a male or a dog all bets are off.