Which one is best specifically for strengthening the Erector spinae muscles
God who fucing knows. I'd assume the one where you hold the barbell.
>>36764177
Heavy squats and deadlifts.
Front squats for upper back.
Heavy SLDLs.
RDL and GM are about the same for spinal erector development.
neither
hyperextensions
>>36764198
>hyperextensions
kek enjoy slipped disc goals/2016
the exercises work most muscles the same (except for grip muscles etc. from bar position) as far as glutes and hamstrings and eretors.
However, as the other anon said, hyperextensions are a better erector iso exercse. However you really don't need one unless your lower back is really weak. They should get pleant of work from squats and deadlifts.
If you high bar, however, I would say immediately start doing either good mornings or RDLs for your posterior chain. I didn't. and wish I had.
>>36764234
good meme
>>36764241
>However you really don't need one
do you even want big erectors m8?
pic related
>>36764304
oly lifters have big erectors because of all the front squats/cleans and pulls they do, not because they do hyperextensions, kek.
>>36764317
do you even wl
dont think you do, you wont get erectors as big as that guy from doing just fsq and cleans
>>36764317
Why do you talk about things you know nothing about?
>After several months of unsuccessfully experimenting with high pulls, good mornings, deadlifts and the like, United States and Pan American heavyweight champion Gary Deal returned from the World Championships. After talking with him at length, it became apparent that the Soviet team was doing a large amount of hyperextensions with heavy weights. A couple of months of experimenting with hyperextensions has given me enough proof to say that this is THE BEST exercise for super-thick erector development.
>>36764366
no shit, they roid ofcourse
>>36764367
if they didn't do them, they'd still have big erectors m8
>>36764367
how can a oly wl have such massive back, but a almost flat ass?
>>36764419
angle and posture
>>36764409
you have to be trolling
>>36765748
yeah bro, everyone with an opinion different than yours has to be trolling...
great attitude
>>36764177
I don't worry about this.
>low bar master race
>>36765824
>low bar squat
kek enjoy slipped disc goals/2016
>>36764367
I can concur, I LOVE these. Ill do em with anywhere from a barbell for reps to 60kg to 6-8
>>36764177
Snatch Grip Deadlifts are literally the endgame of posterior chain development, no that it has anything to do with your question though.
>>36764177
I like RDLs more simply for more grip work and upper back work too, usually try and do RDLs with a wider grip than normal deadlifts. It also doesn't need a squat rack which can be nice if you're in a busy gym, but it's an assist movement so i don't think it'll impact results in any significant way either way.
>>36766745
what about snatch grip romanian deadlifts?
>>36764304
Holy shit
This is a terrible case of kyphosis, right?
It can't be his erectors, right?
>>36766802
ca$h