>Aesthetics >Intelligence What is most important?

Genetics

Insertions

>>36559933
*which

>>36559933
Intelligence. Thats gonna bun burn a lot of people around here, but its what I feel.
Luckily we live in a world where you can have both [spoiler]even though I'm not there yet[/spoiler].

>>36559933
For girls? Aesthetics

>>36559933

aesthetics, for dating

noone gives a shit about you unless you look good first.

otherwise? intelligence, by far. if you are only a pretty face you are as useless as a kardashian.

>>36559933
why do you ask people who have neither?

>>36559933
>>36559941
>>36559954
>>36559974
>>36560362
>>36560384
>>36560414

Ironic you use Dolph Lundgren, Dolph Lundgren had both.

Dolph Lundgren. Dude has some serious brains to go along with that brawn: after several years studying in America (at Washington State and Clemson) and a mandatory two-year stint in the Swedish marine corps, Lundgren graduated with a degree in chemical engineering from Sweden's Royal Institute of Technology. He earned a master’s degree from the University of Sydney, finishing at the top of his class. While working as a bouncer in Australia, Lundgren won a Fulbright scholarship to attend the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — which he soon gave up after he began dating model Grace Jones (who hired him as a bodyguard and had him return with her to New York City).

>>36559933
Elliott Rodger died an incel, and Stephen Hawking got married.

>>36559933
Both are equally important.

If you have aesthetics but little intelligence, you become like a chad. If you have intelligence but little aesthetics, you're a fucking nerd. If you have both, however, then the world is yours.

if you dont have aesthetics, noone will ever care about how smart you are

dont use hawking as an example, being a fucking genius influencing society is a pretty big exception.

>>36560464
lmao why did he go to wsu, its a school for retards and crappy frat parties

i know because i go there and am retarded

>>36560475
After he got rich?

>>36559933
Why not both, like Dolph there?

>>36560931
Well before - Academia isn't exactly a treasure trove. But it's funny you mention that, because OP said:

> What is most important?

not necessarily

> what do women value?

Elliot Rodger was aesthetic and ended up a dead loser who contributed nothing of value. Einstein, Hawking, hell even Richard Feynmann looked like muppets some fucker left out in the sun for too long, and they have contributed immensely to the net understanding of humanity as well as the technology of the world we live in, became famous AND got the ladies. Feynmann was straight up O.G. Player.

>>36560507
He was already a genius before he got crippled though, back then he just looked like a goofy British dude.

>>36561065
Yeah but Elliot Rodger was severely autistic

File: 1445557435458.jpg (105KB, 716x960px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 716x960px

>>36559933
tremendous trip dubs

Good genetics manifests itself as both good looks and a great personality/intelligence.

To answer the OP

good looks is most important attribute
>current year
>not being chad

File: HowToGetLaid.jpg (1MB, 925x3026px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 925x3026px

how accurate is this, /fit/?

>>36562028

98% spot on

>>36560464
>a reported IQ of 160
Seems extremely high, but damn. Dude won at life.

>>36561198
Is this considered Chad?

File: mirinhard.jpg (19KB, 530x340px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 530x340px

>>36559933
>What is most important?
Crush your enemies. See them driven before you. Hear the lamentations of their women