Thread replies: 18
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
Anonymous
6' 2", 164 pounds 6% bf but still have love handles 2016-03-13 01:16:52 Post No. 36364344
[Report] Image search: [Google]
6' 2", 164 pounds 6% bf but still have love handles 2016-03-13 01:16:52 Post No. 36364344
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: ss+(2016-03-12+at+10.03.25).jpg (36KB, 508x576px) Image search:
[Google]
36KB, 508x576px
6' 2", 164 pounds 6% bf but still have love handles
Anonymous
2016-03-13 01:16:52
Post No. 36364344
[Report]
My gym uses a inferred device to calculate body fat and I was put at roughly 6%. Note that this scan was done post heavy work out.
Im apparently 6% bf and 164 pounds at 22 years old. Im "skinny" by most standards but for the life of me I cant get rid of the fat around my love handles. Am I missing something? I thought the only way to get rid of them was through overall weight loss but I dont really have much more to lose.
Am I missing something or is this a mental image thing?
>>
you are not at 6% you are at 15% at least
>>
>>36364376
this
>>
>>36364344
By what method did you get "6%"?
>>
>>36364344
nice b8
all other anons please ignore this thread
>>
File: 1372317525092.jpg (9KB, 240x240px) Image search:
[Google]
9KB, 240x240px
>>36364344
>6%
shut up
>>
>>36364344
fuk da hat3rs brah u look fuarkinnn juicyyyyyyy fuarkkkkkkkk mirin XOXO
>>
do you know what 6% even looks like faggot
google it and enlighten yourself
>>
>>36364344
is this obtainable natty?
>>
>>36364344
looks like you missed a digit there m8
>>
>>36364401
try reading the post you stupid fucking cunt
>>
>>36364344
16%, you mean.
>>
Youre not that low bf
You just sat around all day as a teenager and have the muscle mass of a 13 year old
>>
>>36364344
>inferred device
I can infer that this device blows ass
>>
File: condescending.jpg (12KB, 250x250px) Image search:
[Google]
12KB, 250x250px
>>36364344
6% body fat
>>
>>36364344
16% fix'd
/thread
>>
File: skellyrecruit.jpg (105KB, 500x668px) Image search:
[Google]
105KB, 500x668px
>>36364344
>>
File: AlmostAnonAlmost.jpg (141KB, 508x576px) Image search:
[Google]
141KB, 508x576px
>>36364344
You're 15% at lowest which is the start of ab definition or you do a lot of crunches/situps that force your abs out.
If you refer to the picture linked,
The circled parts are where your abs are obviously starting to show, however everything around the area is still too fat to be below 15%
It's just not possible.
Thread posts: 18
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5