achieveable natty in 12 months of training?

File: webcam-toy-photo52.jpg (50KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 800x600px

more pics

>>36307701
Natty? Yes. 12 months of training? No.

People like to e stat how long they've been at it.

Shame he skipped legdays and looks ridicilous now

File: webcam-toy-photo54.jpg (48KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 800x600px

more picsxx

>>36307701
His body is achievable, but his stats arent in a year. Even just looking at his legs you can tell it's bullshit. He did upper body every day and leg press maybe once a week

>>36307743
this

>>36307716
>500lb Squat
>Skips leg day

Those legs are right in terms of relativity to the rest of his body. It's just the angle. You've been on here soo long that you're starting to think that the T. rex looking people on fit are how people are really supposed to look

>>36307759
He is estatting his squat too

>>36307759
Those aren't 5pl8 legs bro.

>>36307701
Stats are bullshit, probably has been at gym for a year, but was probably in good shape before that

>>36307701
My manlet alarm is going off

>wanting to be a nigger

at least 3 years of natty

>>36307701
if he is justifying it with him beeing black then he is defo on gear. yep nigger genes help but if he just flat out says, it's probs genetics then it's him coming up with an excuse for gains he himself cant believe to be natty.

also the timeframe is not working out for natty. mb if you double it to 2 years, then yea.

friend bulked up almost 18 lbs in 3 weeks, seems to be mostly muscle, like his BF didnt change visually at all. roided?

File: 1lR6FF0rqhLnagYwHH0B4nrQKU9VR1252e.jpg (78KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x480px

>>36307701
not a chance in hell

>>36307972
Considering you can at most put on 2-3lhs of muscle a month (being really generous here) yes your friend roided, and even then probably didnt put on 18lbs of pure muscle.