ITT: celebs you believe are natty

>>35380546
If you're getting paid to get to a certain weight as fast as possible, I think it's stupid not to cheat. There's no good reason not too. I'm not saying wolverine is natty or not, but if he's not then he's fucking stupid.

>>35380566
Some people don't want to ruin their health, how's that stupid? Actors should worry more about their mediocre shitty acting instead of the 5 pounds of lean muscle mass

>>35380546

This gets Photoshop smaller every time I see it.

>>35380566
I don't think he is in any dire financial situation. Why ruin your body for more money when you're already loaded?

>>35380585
>>35380592
>a moderate dose of testosterone run for a few months out of the year will ruin your body
Lol

>>35380566
2 words: Christian Bale

>>35380592
>I don't think he is in any dire financial situation. Why ruin your body for more money when you're already loaded?


Not the person you asked but it isn't all about money for most A-list actors (or really most people in highly competitive fields), it is about being the absolute best. Being the best in your field usually takes some pretty major sacrifices, and I could understand a celebrity, who knew he needed to be fucking shredded for a role in 6 months, doing anything it took to get there.

I have no idea if wolverine is natty or not, but it wouldn't really surprise me if he was't.

Tons of respect, either way. Dude's stronk.

>>35380546
He isn't.

File: 3a80397bd19475c6624374f0ce316a29-hugh-jackman-as-wolverine-then-now.jpg (39KB, 600x313px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x313px

Hugh Jackman is 47

>>35380546

is theres any1 buff in holywood i'd bet on him or jason statham(he was a olympic swimmer before acting) but only because neither of them did any short term transformation and have been lifting for years

but realistically, no1 is natty

>>35383632
>literal olympiad
>natty
Kek