Are these /fa/?

i would generally avoid one shoe brand's obvious knockoff of a major sillhouette from another but thats me

File: new-balance-247-sport-where-to-buy-04.jpg (43KB, 940x660px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 940x660px

>>14134
What are they copying?

>>14135
ultraboost

>>14134
>implying anyone but yourself and other sneaker fags actually pay attention to what brand of shoes and model you wear

most people are just gonna say
>oh nice, off white runner style shoes

File: 9106155503646.jpg (381KB, 1200x1049px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 1200x1049px

Bought those this week

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:08 14:47:12
Image Created	2017:03:07 11:16:43
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	87.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1049
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto

>>14135
>>14136
every athletic fashion shoe in the past 5 years is a direct decedent of the roshe

>>15348
Too bad it's a shit shoe

File: timeless-classic-superstar1.jpg (287KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1500x1000px

>>14133
no these are

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	/fa/ is shit
Camera Software	C++
Photographer	GOD
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	visit 4chan.org/pol/

File: delet_this.png (922KB, 1345x745px) Image search: [Google]

922KB, 1345x745px

>>15369
>that exif

>>15366
True, people wernt saying that when it was released though and i respect the hell out of it either way

>>15383
I think there's a difference between copying and improving

>>15341

I bought these a couple of weeks ago too, honestly its a really great shoe.
I thought it would look like shit after a few days but they still look new.