Techwear

File: image.jpg (487KB, 1280x1761px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 1280x1761px

>>8783013
Looks like these

File: image.jpg (74KB, 500x716px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 500x716px

>>8783013

File: image.jpg (105KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 500x667px

Turtle core

File: tumblr_mpmghjqzxo1st5czqo1_500.png (394KB, 500x618px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 500x618px

anyone know where i can find this?

>>8783046
acronym from a while back

>>8783055
Thanks intimacy!
Wtc OP's coat style?

File: 1408128781355.jpg (111KB, 470x700px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 470x700px

>>8783013

>>8783035
w2c???

>>8783067
It looks like an insulted shell coated with reflective fabric. Nike, TNF, cycling brands usually will put them out.

File: 95b1f2fd-fa52-4a0e-92f2-6a9d85ddf.jpg (34KB, 500x335px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x335px

>>8783035
>those legs
WTF

File: image.jpg (114KB, 490x729px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 490x729px

>>8783087
Looked for this coat for fucking ever, closest I came was original Japan street shoot, does anyone know anything like this shit? It's perfect and gets so many reqs http://www.fashionsnap.com/streetsnap/2009-02-05/1255/

So, "techwear" threads are now as common as "hair" thread, and I've got the to filter too?
Check the fucking catalogue.

>>8783044
Wearing cotton leggings is one of the worst decisions you could make. This isn't techwear, but the coat is still fantastic.

>>8783110
Contribute or shut the fuck up, it's not just your special cycle ninja club that needs good tech stuff

File: image.jpg (47KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 640x427px

>>8783013

>>8783111
Agreed, but that collar is dope

>>8783055
thanks man. do you have a general idea of the year?

File: image.jpg (31KB, 630x315px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 630x315px

Overplayed/expensive but Acronym's sleeveless have awesome hoods and collars, not really techwear as you're gonna get soaked

>>8783111
How do you know they're cotton?

>>8783099
Asians, can't live with em, can't live without em

File: image.jpg (33KB, 500x420px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x420px

>>8783013
I don't know what it is but this aesthetic is so nice, "real" plain raincoat hoods are a little boring and plebby

>>8783087
I really love this coat
Found similar Visvem Nomad but just doesn't beat this in terms of practicality, cut, fabric and colour
Where to cop similar?

>>8783168
i have no idea unfortunately! All I know is that it's Acronym.

File: f9476041-6310-4b40-b07e-e662c03ff.jpg (83KB, 466x640px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 466x640px

>>8783189
They look like it, even if they are a poly blend it's still shitty and will never keep water out. I don't know of anywhere that makes leggings like that mostly they are just simple solid colors. Gyakusou is the only brand I know of that makes techy leggings that actually look cool

>>8783261
no problem. cheers anyway, been looking for the designer of that parka for longer than i care to admit

File: image.jpg (108KB, 600x861px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 600x861px

>>8783013
Bump de la bump

>>8783349
I'd lurk around the Acronym thread on SUFU, maybe someone else has an idea.

be warned: it's probably exorbitantly expensive and hard to come by, so. fair warning lol.

http://supertalk.superfuture.com/index.php/topic/116132-acronym/

>>8783013
but the wind just blows into them, you have to hold them onto your head

File: image.jpg (23KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x333px

Aw fuck man, still no one knows what OPs jacket is

Also how's the durability on these?

>>8783566
>>8783566
The sole gets torn up a little fast which is annoying but otherwise they're fine so far. No creases or anything.

>>8783566

Just got my pair of triple blacks.

They're comfy as fuck, but they're not meant for durability. There's even a disclaimer on the tag that says they're not meant to be used for traditional athletic shit. The upper is neoprene so it will keep your feet fairly warm, but it isn't a functional shoe by any stretch of the imagination. If you live in a mild climate and like having kicks that you can slip on and off easily, they are top notch.

File: image.jpg (37KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x375px

>>8783587
Thanks guys, sound comfy af, but do you know an equivalent that'll put up with a bit of wear? Ty for detailed response, much appreciated

Pic: old ass Nike Predators from the 90s, still dope today

>>8783046
that doesn't really look like acronym. i've read up a lot on acr and own a few garments from them but idk.

Ugh still looking for op's blue shell, I've been at it for a month
I think it's American Apparel, is this a potential source for this thing?

>>8783645
Pretty sure it's not, I remember in one of these threads an anon tracked it down and it wasn't ACR. It was some second rate tech brand trying to look like ACRONYM but definitely not ACR.

>>8783099
fatty

>>8783665
i'm glad i'm not the only one lol. the material doesn't look like anything acr uses, and honestly they haven't changed their aesthetic since the company's inception and that jacket is pretty incongruous with past collections (fw1415 is a step in that direction but definitely not there yet). furthermore it doesnt have logo tape or forcelock which is included on a lot if not most acrnm jackets.

>>8783653
Are we looking at the same image?

>>8783691
The silhouette is what did it for me ACR never does stuff that slim or long. It's always much shorter practical proportions considering they are so focused on anatomical movement.

>>8783694
The blue waterproof, yeah

>>8783709
hmm yeah you're right. i didn't even think about that. nevertheless i'm curious as to who makes the jacket.

>>8783669
If you are actually living out the Techwear aesthetic you should never be that skinny. Techwear is about getting out and doing stuff. Get active being physically fit, not some tiny little twig. That fit isn't even Techwear, bitch is wearing jeans and docs plus that jacket looks like it's cotton. 0/10 wouldn't come close too.

>>8783143
I love this picture. Thanks for sharing it.

File: image.jpg (326KB, 1122x886px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 1122x886px

>>8783724
It's silver man, that's just the light reflecting off of it and giving it a different hue. American Apparel has never put out anything even close to that.

>>8783665
>>8783691
>>8783709

again i'm caught talking out of my ass. learning new things every day.

>>8783859
No hate bb just correcting mistakes God knows how many times it's happened to me.

>>8783731
It's okay! V.inspiring, the pic is the sort of environment I always think of when considering the protective merits of techwear

File: image.jpg (95KB, 1035x491px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1035x491px

>>8783745
I'd look through the photoshoot someone mentioned, this jacket is definitely a shade of blue, but it might be a more denim-y gray/blue than ice blue, but good explanation anyway :) now i just need to find it...

>>8784053
All not seeing any blue whatsoever. But good luck

File: 6b00f253-a845-42eb-bc51-639d49ccb.jpg (204KB, 747x1121px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 747x1121px

>>8784031
More waterfall techwear inspo. This seriously is one of the most amazing fit pics I've ever seen.

File: 7b978569-f9d1-4313-a533-56673c621.jpg (48KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x333px

>>8784090

File: image.jpg (186KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 800x1200px

>>8784093
Grudge shit right here

>>8783261
It's not Acronym ya dumb cunt

far from it

>>8784116
yo i havent seen u post for ages
sup

File: image.jpg (55KB, 210x555px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 210x555px

>>8784082 Yeah this guys right, it's silver you twat, blue light

(I fucking want this too, wtc)

>>8784128
sup du

I barely come here anymore but it's fun to see how things don't change at all here

>>8784090
Any idea what coat's in this fit?

>>8783046
Here's the sauce for this jacket btw
http://www.tomonari.co.kr/shop/shopdetail.html?branduid=49730&xcode=099&mcode=002&scode=&type=X&sort=order&cur_code=099002&GfDT=Zmh3VA%3D%3D

>new meme coat

>>8784164
ACR cape

File: image.jpg (31KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x500px

>>8784176
Thank you based Fin

>>8784176
whoever just copped green medium, fuck u

>>8784176
i cant find it on the english version of the site

>>8784341
i don't think there is such a thing

>>8784341
it's not on there, you have to order via the korean.

>>8784176
>tfw no tattoed a v e r a g e koreangf

>>8784373
fug... thanks

File: tumblr_llbf4xshZk1qe1v1fo1_500.jpg (25KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x333px

Is this a good shoe for a Techwear fit?
Thinking about getting a pair in all black

>Reebok OG Pump Fury

>>8784418
>gaping hole in the side

not waterproof, not techwear

>>8785043
what if this is meant without socks though?
that would be semi waterproof
idk i think its good for summer fits

>>8784418
i saw some off white/cream ones that look p nice
i would avoid solid black but thats just me

>>8784418
Great techwear shoe, I really love it.

Beside that, it's ecco2k approved.

>>8783044
what is this pic from?

>>8783055
It is not acronym.

File: 01[1].jpg (174KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 400x600px

Where's the best place to cop Acronym from?

>>8787495
acronym.com

>>8785043
>implying techwear is just about staying dry in wet weather
>implying you can't wear tech for hotter climates/seasons

File: 1393467207138.jpg (24KB, 346x250px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 346x250px

>>8787505
>obvious scam site

File: 1382518435614.jpg (515KB, 700x1320px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 700x1320px

>>8787505
it's http://www.acrnm.com/ you buffoon

>>8787701
>>8787720
>implying I didn't know I was linking to acronym the marketing company

Could /fa/ advise some tech shoes for winter ?
Preferably high-tops and under 200€

>>8787720
What's up with acrnm writing a size 38cm in waist (which is fucking huge) for a size 'small'. Do they measure differently cause dey tiny liwlejaps?

>>8788413
Hmm... I now see it says '1/2 waist'. Would that mean a size small is actually a size 19? But that's like the size of an infant... wtf.

>>8784134
North Face White label. It's Korea only, but it's relatively cheap.

>>8788427
38cm is roughly 14 inches, 14 inches times two is... 28. so it's a waist size 28. jesus christ man.

>>8788530
plen

>>8783640
w2c?

What brands/ pieces are good for comfycore techwear? I'm thinking plenty of pockets, comfortable material while being protected from the elements for f/w months. I live in Norway so the fall can be quite wet while winter will be quite cold. Ideal fit will be a little loose while remaining streamlined.

>>8784176
it all looks like yesstyle tier shit

File: tumblr_n2apebLpye1sokt9jo1_1280.jpg (298KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1000x667px

>>8784115
things like this remind me why i still come here <3

File: 1403903167286.jpg (58KB, 471x600px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 471x600px

Wish I had this

File: image.jpg (25KB, 232x292px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 232x292px

>>8784116
ya we already established that you fucking mongoloid. I acknowledged I was misinformed as well.

>ya dingus

>>8789870
hmm that looks pretty cool, i wonder if it looks cool in person though, i am unsure

File: IMG_6654.jpg (392KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1000x667px

>>8784090
i swear 50% of the inspo you guys post is from this one blog

>>8789624
>>8789810
>>8789961
>tfw no tech kvlt qt gf

File: IMG_7433-Edit1.jpg (354KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 800x1200px

>>8789961
http://www.keithtio.com/
http://www.selinasarno.com/

File: 104-OUTLIER-UVPoncho-Showdown.jpg (84KB, 880x587px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 880x587px

ponchos up in this mother fucker!

File: poncho3[1].jpg (148KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1000x1000px

>>8790027
ayy

File: techfleeceponcho.jpg (22KB, 500x313px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x313px

ayyyy

>>8789932
>95% of fashion

>>8783730
all that shit spouted
>saying techwear isnt about being skeleton
>saying that person isnt wearing techwear
>being butthurt
>implying techwear is 'about getting out and doing stuff'
no it isnt you huge mongoloid
and that person wouldnt let you come close to him/her anyways

>>8789870
foking beaut

>>8790027
>imma go kung fu on yo ass

>>8789870
stone island is god tier

File: undercover fw0708 hooded parka.jpg (87KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 500x375px

>>8783640

These are Air Carnivores not Predators. Just saying.

>>8783035
confirmed for nosquatz

>>8789810
Are those seriously sneakers in the freezing wet snow

File: 1402819781944.jpg (455KB, 1000x749px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 1000x749px

if this guy had just picked better shoes

>>8795658
I dont see whats wrong with the shoes

>>8795658
Everything in this image is fucked

>>8795675
$80 shoes should never be paired with a $1k+ parka

they just take the outfit down a few notches

>>8795682
Errolson Hugh usually styles his own products with cheaper shoes

I think the shoes fit the feel of the outfit, and doesn't draw attention away from the parka, which is the main piece.
What would look better than trainrendors?

File: tumblr_mp7blywu8F1qgeruwo1_500[1].jpg (77KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 500x750px

would love to see what sort of techwear fits /fa/ can achieve
does anyone even pursue this style?

not once in a waywt thread have i seen a fit based on tech

>>8795690
I think the shoes actually do draw attention away from the parka.
I guess the price thing was a bit misworded. What I meant by it is that the trainerendors look cheap and out of place.
A better pick would've been something sleeker to flow better. Flyknit Lunar 2's maybe

File: Giggling_bitches.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>8795658
>if this guy had just picked better shoes
>thinking the shoes are actually the only wrong thing in this
>mfw /fa/ never learns

>>8795682
what a dumb fucking statement.

File: tumblr_lkxnd6DoEq1qixcyio1_500.jpg (31KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x500px

>>8795693
I'd post a ton if I weren't poor. So many ideas, not sure if they'd be necessarily innovative though. Closest I have to anything techwear is a pair of commuter cargos and flyknits. They're nice flyknits though.

Techwear has even gotten me semi-interested in DIY stuff, maybe like an anorak or something. But I'm probably not cut out for it. Feels bad.

>>8795693

W2C shoes?

>>8795746

Nike Roshe Run Metric

only came out in women's sizes for some stupid reason

>>8795746
roshe run metric

good luck finding a pair. ever.

>>8795658
>that stupid fucking "deep" abstract painting

jesus fucking christ that makes me more mad than the shitty "dark and mysterious" fit. you know if you went up to this guy on the street and just straight up started making fun of him and his clothes he would just start stuttering and saying "i dont want any trouble i dont want any trouble please leave me alone" fucking faggot.

>>8795802

Dude, that's just some Converge banner. Relax.
Great job posing like a tough guy on some bulgarian animatronics board.

Anyone make any progress on the OP's jacket or similar?>>8783013

>>8796308
read
>>8788512

>>8796393
>North Face White label
Thank you sir.

Guys whats a decent black tech-y jacket? Willing to spend 150-200 bongaroos

>>8795710
Post a fit

>>8795693
Techwear is expensive so most people can't go out and build a full fit

Best I can do is
>Arc'teryx Solano jacket
>Reigning Champ sweater
>Patagonia shirt
>Levi's Commuters 511
>Onitsuka Tigers 72 California

As you can see, only every other piece is actually "tech"

>>8789810
fucking nikes ruined the look

Are there any cheap alternatives to acronym that follows closely to it's style?

>>8798203
Don't get cheap knock off shit when it comes to techwear. You'll just get an uncomfortable shit jacket that won't keep out any water and fits like a box.

w2c good techwear shoes

File: gameover.png (19KB, 608x160px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 608x160px

>>8798203
Well, what is it that draws you about Acronym? What's the Acronym you like?

In the last techwear thread, two people agreed that they both liked the J43-GT and S6-C the best from the new collection; I thought they were the most underwhelming pieces, unless you count the cash-in accessories (tho, I think I'd actually rather have the shemagh and beanie over either those).

OTOH, the J-40CH, P16A-CH, and to a lesser extent J41-GT were exactly the garments I've been dreaming of in the aether for months, except better.

>>8798213
There's cheap things that aren't knock off shit.

Acronym is a little hard, because they're one of the most distinctive brands going and Errolson would be a master even if he wasn't charting new territory. But I think we can find >>8798203 something he likes.

Also pic related game over everybody, stop worrying about what's tech and the size of someone's fucking thighs in an *inspo* image and just wear cool clothes.

>>8795723
Visibly DIY'd tech clothing is awesome. I'll see if I can find some good pics later.

>>8795802
There is literally nothing wrong with his fit and I will eat a fucking hardshell if you have anything more interesting than that on your walls.

File: y.jpg (26KB, 369x547px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 369x547px

should I cop this as a winter jacket? its by clymb, anyone have experience with the brand?

>>8795802
>>8795821

Adding on tow hat he said, on the top right, you can clearly see a face. Since you are able to tell there's a face there, that makes the painting non-objective instead of abstract.

http://www.arcteryx.com/product.aspx?language=EN&gender=Mens&category=Shell_Jackets&model=Theta-AR-Jacket

need a good jacket for techwear outfit im putting together, cutoff is 570~, do you think this'll work?

>>8798367
>ugly indian
who cares

>>8795802
He'd probably actually say "shut the fuck up you autist, your cargo shorts don't even fit"

techwear is just snowboarder/skier core

>>8799881
Or bikercore
Or runnercore
Out /out/core

It's functional weatherproof clothing.

>>8789577
Some of the other stuff on the site looks pretty good - do you think it's all yesstyle tier shit and not worth buying? Do I just have shit taste? ;_;

File: 090ae282-b247-4382-a96b-7e931761e.png (523KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 720x1280px

>>8783013
korean clothing companies sell them on ebay all day long. Notice how all of these models are korean? yeah. They go for about $15

dont forget to order your shit 2 sizes larger because asians are little creatures.

>>8798758
?

>>8798742
There isn't anything better, just different.

Personally, I strongly prefer Napoleon pockets to those high set, over-harness handwarmers, but if you're okay with the pocket configuration and it's otherwise what you're looking for go for it.

>>8798758
?

>>8800323
that guy is clearly phillipean you uncultured fuck

>>8783035
w2c jeans
jumper
jacket

>>8783019
What jackets are those?

File: tumblr_m9dxki6GZe1rqbzc1o1_500.jpg (200KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 500x500px

serious lack of high-vis in this thread

Hi, I'm gonna be in Zurich for 6 months next year and I plan on doing plenty of hiking with some snow sports. I'm new to tech wear and was wondering if you guys could recommend some waterproof trainers that would be suitable for hiking. Also, where do I begin looking for other waterproof sweats?

>>8796482
b-bumpu

>>8796482
Any basic shell from a mountaineering brand. Patagonia, TNF, Hardwear, Marmot

>>8800323
I want this, can you give me a link to it please?

>>8803115
It's just yesstyle bullshit dint buy

>>8795693
>tfw too poor for it
all i can do is a tnf wind breaker, tnf fleece and free runs
I'm planning to extend my tech wardrobe tho

File: tumblr_nbsgbnw3vN1rh1fi6o1_1280.jpg (195KB, 670x1018px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 670x1018px

I think we all look at the same Tumblrs, but this was nice to see. The very first J1. Anyone know what the fabric was?

The flap on the upper chest, above the flak pocket, is what they did before Forcelock - under it there's a mesh pocket to secure your earphones. I don't remember what other early Acronym pieces I've seen it on to Google up an illustration, but that's what it is. Cooler, I think, but less practical and less fluid that Forcelock. (Fluid > Cool, IMO FTR.)

>>8795658
JACKET?

>>8804909
ACR Cape, can't remember from which season though

>>8795723
where the fuck do i cop this

>>8798614
can these even be purchased anymore?

File: nf318-4.jpg (416KB, 674x774px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 674x774px

>>8804909
Acronym SS-CP2.

>>8805102
Not available anymore, it's from White Mountaineering's previous BLK line. I see a few things from that line on yahoo.jp sometimes though.

>>8798367
>Visibly DIY'd tech clothing is awesome
I agree, but mainly what I'd want to do is something more sleek, similar to Veilance but budgeting on the material and just focusing on the aesthetics. Maybe experimenting. Sort of like cutting corners to spend less than I would for real techwear. I'd be getting into it for the wrong reasons...
Would love to see some pics you might have though.