What I'm trying to get at is that the objectively best styles are formed from buying things that they like with little to no fashion influence/inspo and the most /fa/ thing to do is to not care what others think and being confident in what you wear, who you are, and what you look like so isnt browsing a "fashion" board that rates, provides inspo, and puts certain people on a pedestal the most un /fa/ thing to do.
am I reading too much into this or am I right?
>>12762178
>taste
>objective
>I know the reason why people I dont know buy things
>my rainbow mohawk and leopard-print capri shorts make me /fa/, because I dont care if you think I look like a faggot
congrats, you are the faggot of the year
>>12762183
not what I meant anon I mean I love fashion it's a hobby of mine but what Im asking is; is browsing /fa/ "/fa/" or is it a means for people to look the different in the same manner, for example the most praised fits in waywt are usually the most distinguished ones
>>12762178
bump
>>12762178
a closed community is gonna produce an inbred style, hence the constant doc marten/vans/slp/whatever threads
you can choose to participate in that or you can take an alternative route whereby you just lurk and analyze the pictures and build your own style over time
there's no right or wrong way to use /fa/ but there are different things to take away from it
>>12762205
so if you had to choose is it /fa/ to browse /fa/ or can there never be a /fa/ because to know /fa/ you have to first know what it is and then try to emulate it?
>>12762207
I think you need to take a break from 4chan my man
>>12762210
fair enough
>>12762183
JUST
BEE
URSELFFFFFFFF
>>12762178
First rule of /fa/ Full Rick or fuck off.