Do the pants look ridiculous?

>>12694198
I'd recommend going /loose/ with your body type

They absolutely look ridiculous

>>12694198
I don't think they look ridiculous friendo, I just think you need to cuff them

>>12694198
they obviously dont fit dont listen to this retard >>12694220

go back and find a pair that fits

tuck in your shirt homo

>>12694233
I didn't buy them. But I'm just not sure what I'm supposed to buy. Are these just too skinny through the leg? They're fine at waist.

>>12694338
they're too long leading to some really crappy looking stacks/bagginess at the bottom. They fall apart after going to the leg area. I think you just need a shorter inseam

>>12694198

cuff or get the next shorter size

>>12694398
I just meant how tight they are around the legs. They're all the same inseam, so I'd just get them hemmed.

>>12694455
tightness is fine just don't stand in that retarded pose or learn to take a decent picture

>>12694534
What's a decent pose?

>>12694198
Slim fit is on the way out, me buckos!

>>12694722
>Fashion forecaster.

So trendy!

the pants arent a problem, not tucking your shirt is

>>12694736
Do people tuck their shirts into jeans?