What brands are never okay to wear together? What brands are

File: as2.jpg (489KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 1000x667px

Posting the obvious.

>>12691978
why not

>>12691974
>wearing anything that shows the brand

>>12691991
because they are competing companies and being the consumer whore that you are, you have to choose on or the other

File: cristiano-ronaldo-adidas-nike-ad-00.jpg (322KB, 960x576px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 960x576px

>>12692001
>tfw football kit sponsor is Adidas but Nike has sponsored my cleats.

Truly best of both worlds.

Branding in general isn't effay

>>12691978
>Nike shoes
>Adidas socks

Are these ok?

>>12692044
Never

Isn't it a meme right now to conspicuously wear different sports brands at the same time?

>>12692048
What about when hooping I wear the best socks Nike Elite Crew Dri-Fit with my favorites shoes the Adidas Crazy Explosives?

File: 1479941934602.jpg (78KB, 444x460px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 444x460px

>>12692054
I sure hope so, I do it a lot on purpose.

File: 1471349880836.jpg (8KB, 250x236px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x236px

>>12692059
>wearing explosives
N-now hold on there buddy

>having visible branding
mistake #1

File: 41617974su_14_e.jpg (201KB, 1571x2000px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1571x2000px

>>12692330
This can be done extremely well in techwear.

>>12692337
pic unrelated

>>12692337
Oh absolutely, but branding like the OP's is pretty cancerous.

>>12692337
If you're a hypebeast that needs to flaunt maybe
There's a reason Arcteryx's Veilance line has no branding, as opposed to their regular bright red blue yellow alpha beta sv lt jackets

>>12692352
I just used a random image. What I'm getting at is throwing in the occasional check or adidas leaf thing can not only work, but improve the fit.

File: IMG_1267.png (616KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

616KB, 750x1334px

Guys I got these pants and they're so comfy, but I don't like the little tag logo on the leg. Would blacking out with sharpie work? They're Patagonia

>>12691978
only normies perpetuate this tired meme

File: IMG_3178.jpg (72KB, 525x522px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 525x522px

>>12692347
>small subtle logo on the chest
>cancerous

Anything that goes beyond their own style generally clashes unless it's specific

Wearing GAP and Lacoste together won't result in anything innately bad. Boring, normal, etc? Sure. But never innately bad akin to something you'd see from somebody wearing Walmart and Target clothing mixed with exaggerated silhouhette clothing like cheap flannel shirts, wrangler jeans with Rick Owens high top Ramones.

But wearing your fitted, plain, white shirt you got from dollar tree, and the slim fit pants from H&M with some regular Rick Owens boat shoes would be significantly less heinous.

>>12692013
Climacool is godtier, so is the Nike cleat fit. You're doing well

>>12692935
Why black out the label? Patagonia is effay as shit

>>12693067
Eh I just have some Patagonia shirts too. Feel like having both the pants and shirt on is a little much

Don't worry about fucking branding Jesus Christ worry about how the clothing looks

>>12692059
crazy explosives are good balling shoes, nike elite socks are good balling socks, so go ahead. disregard the faggot that said no adidas socks + nike shoes, if you're wearing pants that cover it, it should be ok, or if you're balling.

>>12691978
Who gives a fuck

>>12692935
what pants? are these good for a techwear basis?

Adidas x Nike

>>12691978
yeah this is gross
>>12692337
stone island is gross
>>12692935
sharpie doesn't work all that well. patagonia logo is fine

>>12692935
take them off with a thread ripper

>>12692092
They're good basketball shoes. They look retarded but they perform really well.

>>12697704
It was a joke anon. Wearing explosives as in a bomb belt.