[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Why are Ricks better than Rafs?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 3

File: IMG_0071.jpg (583KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0071.jpg
583KB, 960x640px
Why are Ricks better than Rafs?
>>
>>12671976
because you're a memer with no tastes who needs to be validated by the Internet.
>>
has anyone ever requested that their ricks not be met with physical contact?
>>
>>12671976
what model are these
>>
>>12672155
Tech runners
>>
rafs look like bionicle feet and i'd only wear them if i was famous
>>
>>12671976
I might have taken you seriously if you had posted an actually good Rick shoe instead of that cheap Adidas shit.
>>
>>12672237
There's more to Raf than Ozweegos and Response Trail.
>>
>>12672002
Any unsolicited friction against my Rafs will be severely frowned upon.
>>
>>12672434
>against my Rafael Simons footwear
FTFY

Also Rickdidas and Rafdidas are so different there's no point in comparing
And Rick shoes and Raf shoes are also so different
>>
>>12672448
Any and all contact to my Raf Simons footwear will be considered trespassing and treated as an act of aggression.
>>
ALL
KINDS

OF CRAZY COLORS
>>
>>12672414
it may be possible that op was talking about adidas collaborations ?
>>
File: SAM_9181.jpg (1MB, 3648x2079px) Image search: [Google]
SAM_9181.jpg
1MB, 3648x2079px
Tips on cleaning pic related? Getting pretty dusty
>>
File: 1459019076356.png (366KB, 600x726px) Image search: [Google]
1459019076356.png
366KB, 600x726px
>tfw no tech runners my size
>>
>>12673726
Tfw you use a cartoon reaction picture
>>
>>12671976
they look pretty shit in this picture, probably generally up close. much potential but the front half just isn't enough
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 3


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.