[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

I've never really been a fan of Palace but after seeing

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 28
Thread images: 21

File: Palace FW17 F1.jpg (257KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F1.jpg
257KB, 1170x780px
I've never really been a fan of Palace but after seeing their Autumn 2017 lookbook I may have to cop a few pieces by them.

Gonna post their entire lookbook, what do you guys think? Overpriced/overhyped supreme wannabe's or is genuine heat about to hit the streets
>>
File: Palace FW17 F2.jpg (227KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F2.jpg
227KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: Palace FW17 F3.jpg (272KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F3.jpg
272KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: Palace FW17 F4.jpg (236KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F4.jpg
236KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: Palace FW17 F5.jpg (314KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F5.jpg
314KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: Palace FW17 F6.jpg (217KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F6.jpg
217KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: Palace FW17 F7.jpg (141KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F7.jpg
141KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: Palace FW17 F8.jpg (244KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F8.jpg
244KB, 1170x780px
>>
Why is looking bad effay?
>>
File: Palace FW17 F9.jpg (189KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F9.jpg
189KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: Palace FW17 F10.jpg (291KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F10.jpg
291KB, 1170x780px
>>12665234
elaborate on why you think it looks bad.

I'm genuinely curious.
>>
File: Palace FW17 F11.jpg (229KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F11.jpg
229KB, 1170x780px
>>
i've enjoyed their past staff (mainly adidas collab trackies lol)
not this stuff so much
>>
File: Palace FW17 F12.jpg (242KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F12.jpg
242KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: Palace FW17 F13.jpg (310KB, 1170x827px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F13.jpg
310KB, 1170x827px
>>12665240
Interesting, I was never a fan of the addidas collab. Mainly because I couldn't see myself wearing any of that stuff while I could pretty much see myself taking pieces from this collection and incorporating it into my wardrobe.
>>
File: Palace FW17 F14.jpg (211KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F14.jpg
211KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: Palace FW17 F15.jpg (249KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
Palace FW17 F15.jpg
249KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: palace-autumn-001.jpg (44KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
palace-autumn-001.jpg
44KB, 1170x780px
and a few pieces I'm eyeing
>>
File: palace-autumn-05.jpg (46KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
palace-autumn-05.jpg
46KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: palace-autumn-53.jpg (45KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
palace-autumn-53.jpg
45KB, 1170x780px
would these be considered Chukka loafers?

I've never seen something like this before.
>>
File: palace-autumn-54.jpg (68KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
palace-autumn-54.jpg
68KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: palace-autumn-55.jpg (60KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
palace-autumn-55.jpg
60KB, 1170x780px
>>
File: palace-autumn-56.jpg (59KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]
palace-autumn-56.jpg
59KB, 1170x780px
>>
Looks awful and forgettable
>>
>>12665355
elaborate
>>
>>12665221

Honestly this is the only good look and I'm grudgingly admitting it.

I'm not a fan of this late 80s early 90s revival that's been happening in streetwear for the last 2 or 3 years.

The fit and color schemes of the clothes were terrible then and still are. I want something new.
>>
>>12665234
People are sacrificing wearing loose clothes that fit horribly just to spit slim fit and seem ahead of the curve
>>
>>12665380
Spite*
Thread posts: 28
Thread images: 21


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.