Ultraboost 3.0 size question

>>12664606
damn how much do the shoes in that pic cost
linK?

>>12664617
pic is from google and I can get them for 180 euro

>>12664606
don't go up a size in the 3.0 they fit slightly big and are more relaxed than previous versions

Are these good running shoes or is just for fashion?

>>12665629
apparently they're very comfortable running shoes but they don't last that long if you were to use them for running, maybe grab cheaper boost model instead.

>>12665629
the latter

>>12665629
nobody in their right mind pays 180€ for running shoes

My pure boosts were size 42⅔ and my ultra boost 2.0's are 42 (which I wear without the insole) and they had a similar snug fit. 3.0 knit is pretty loose and a half size down is often recommended, so if I were you I'd get 43⅓ or even 42⅔ for a more snug fit

>>12665629
I'd imagine the 3.0 sucks for running because the knit is so loose, but 1.0's with the contintinental rubber and 2.0's are good, since the knit's construction is so much better.

>>12665821
Well, people who are serious about running and want good running shoes often do.

>>12665629
honestly only nikes make good running shoes