[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What are some good options for white leather trainers in the

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 27
Thread images: 6

File: Tennis_White_Outdoor.jpg (767KB, 2400x2400px) Image search: [Google]
Tennis_White_Outdoor.jpg
767KB, 2400x2400px
What are some good options for white leather trainers in the $100 - $200 range? The only shoes in this category I ever see discussed / recommended here are Stans & CPs (a bit like eating only at McDonald's or Four Seasons). I'm looking for a middle ground. I was looking into a few different models online but it's hard to determine quality, value, etc.-

Greats Royale
Kennith Cole Kam
Epaulet Tennis Trainer (pictured)
Aldo Haener
Saturdays Derek

Anyone have experience with these? Any other recommendations? I can't be the only person on this board with a budget in between $60 and $400 looking for this style of shoe.
>>
>>12562671
You won't get full-grain leather at that price, friendo. There is no middle ground! CPS OR BUST!
>>
>>12562677
90% sure this is bait but just in case the Greats Royale I mentioned in my OP, for example, is $150, full grain leather & made in Italy.
>>
>>12562693
then get those and fuck off they wont be half as good as cps and i was not paid to say this... c-cuck..
>>
Veja esplar
>>
>>12562703
jej
>>
I got used CPs on Grailed. I actually like the worn in look because I want to look less anal about my shoes and it was a fun purchase because /fa hyped them for so long. No regrets and get compliments often
>>
I bought mine new for like $280 but buying used

>>12563225

is also perfectly acceptable.
Just don't buy greats >>12562693 or other shit tier internet brands. It makes you look like a milquetoast try hard r/mfa high school kid who thinks acne is the epitome of high fashion.
>>
Kent wang
>>
>>12563349
This
https://www.kentwang.com/shoes/sneaker-white.html#

Also SLP
>>
>>12563349
Is he family with alexander wang?
>>
I would say get the Greats Royale because I have their OG pair and love it. OG pairs had an "ugly" suede panel and a tan leather logo patch on the tongue and gold branding on the heel but since customer feedback said to remove them, they removed all those things making the shoe ugly. Now it's a great shoe and you don't pre-order and wait several months like Gustin which would otherwise be my number one pick if not for the wait.
>>
File: 1.jpg (76KB, 748x561px) Image search: [Google]
1.jpg
76KB, 748x561px
>>12562671
You want these
>>
File: Untitled.png (189KB, 727x628px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
189KB, 727x628px
>>12563250
>Just don't buy greats or other shit tier internet brands. It makes you look like a milquetoast try hard r/mfa high school kid who thinks acne is the epitome of high fashion.
So one of these shoes makes me look like "a milquetoast try hard r/mfa high school kid" while the other makes me look like, what, the coolest kid on the block?

"Minimal" white leather trainers all look basically the same. CPs aren't even cheap used. It's fine if that's what you like but in the OP I gave a price range. What specifically makes the Greats a bad shoe aside from your personal distaste based on your perception of the brand? The branding is barely even noticeable.

>>12563349
>>12564371
These are dope, thanks.

>>12564417
>I have their OG pair and love it.
thx, this is what I was looking for (someone who's actually owned a pair).
>>
>>12565934
does everyone love these or is it just one guy posting the same picture?
>>
>>12567154
Everyone does love these. Go and get them
>>
>>12567650
Idk I am worried it could be paid advertising
>>
>>12567728
How could it be advertising since I see no brand
>>
I don't even like these type of trainers but I thought of /fa/ when I saw these

http://www.jigsaw-online.com/product/campbell-leather-trainers/J32756_WH000
>>
>>12562671
Filippa K Morgan lows

Between $160-200
>>
>>12562671
Stan Smiths you fucking faggot do not buy CP knockoffs.
>>
Raf Stans on sale.
>>
>>12562671
Try HUF
>>
File: buddy.jpg (59KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
buddy.jpg
59KB, 1000x1000px
buddy bull terriers
>>
>>12562671
I've owned the epaulets for a year and a half. The toe caps and heels are kinda scuffed up from biking around, but that's my fault for not taking better care of them. Other than that and the sole, they haven't deteriorated. $200 isn't a bad price at all for them.

Mine came with tan leather inners instead of those grey ones though.
>>
>>12565934
what are these?
>>
Givenchy flexy kicks
Thread posts: 27
Thread images: 6


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.