just purchased this Louis Vuitton and i was wondering if the

Dose it matter?

>>12548141
hell yeah it does i dont want any fake designer

>>12548162
Why not, it makes no difference
If it looks good, wear it.
If not, don't wear it.
Simple.

>>12548162
Well designed fake designer is better though. You should want to buy fake designer that has even larger details that shows its not authentic.

Like I got a pair of Yeezies with the words FAKE-350 stamped to the side instead of SPLY-350. I get compliments all of the time--especially after I told them I paid $3000 for it.

Did you purchase it from neiman, saks, or the LV store?
If yes its real, if no its fake.

>>12548183
>>12548190
broccboi redditors. you have to go back with buying fake stuff.

>>12548122
Don't know about serial numbers but you could do a stitch count or something to confirm. Check to make sure the patterns have symmetry etc

File: 538.jpg (95KB, 421x834px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 421x834px

>>12548190
>Yeezies
>FAKE-350
>compliments all of the time--especially after I told them I paid $3000
This has to be bait.

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-20 at 10.45.15 AM.png (1MB, 1062x1180px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1062x1180px

>>12548264
this is it

>>12548199
no it was purchased used from a designer retailer

Muhammad, is this you?

>>12548303
Why would you buy second hand LV? If you can't afford the official retailers that means you're buying above your means. You're like my friend who buys phones and electronics he can barely afford. Pathetic really

>>12548287
not every shitpost is bait, it was clearly a joke.

File: 1409071900311.jpg (12KB, 560x400px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 560x400px

>>12548577
Speaking of Muhammad, did Louis Vuitton did anything different for the past decade other than pandering to the lowest common denominator? I'm aware about doing the cancerous Supreme collab

>>12548917
lol you can't even buy this iteration of the safari bag new anymore you uncultured swine. I bet you think buying a Patek from the 60s is brokeboi shit too. Pathetic

>>12548917
LV they stopped production on the danube bags in 2009 and its something I've wanted... I would have bought from LV if i had the choice bub.

>>12548941
lets see your shitty patek that youre grandad bought for like $250 in the 60s.

>>12549264
You are stupid.

File: Tired Pepe.jpg (11KB, 234x250px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 234x250px

>>12548941
LV panders to niggers and white trash, its not effay by any means

it was a dead meme from the early 2000s, people buying LV are only impressing other out of touch trash

>>12549455
meh.

It's for sure "on trend" again now if you care about that sort of thing. I agree with you though for the most part. It's certainly more fun to buy leather goods from a store like LV than try to avoid it and go to some retailer with shit customer service and buy a minimalist hunk o junk

>>12548299
louis vuitton doesn't cut the lv monogram, look at the straps. the leather is real, check the hardware.

>>12548299
Looks suspicious. Look at the seams on the middle of the bag, now look at the pinwheels above the seams, one is a few mm higher, that shit wouldn't pass QC

File: 1497323637238.gif (348KB, 500x338px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 500x338px

>>12548183
this is sum pseudo philosophical redditor fucking dip ,,
>I don't really care abut quality in my garments just the visual appeal
2 month lasting garment ass fuck u

>>12549963
Then don't buy shit you cannot afford. The only people who ask these sorts of questions are poor people who shouldn't be wearing the shit in the first place, so they decide to buy a shady looking piece at a discount.

If you truly love designer clothing because of its design elements, & not because you want to make up for some socioeconomic insecurity, then save up some money and purchase a legit piece. Better yet, go design and sew up your own shit.

In the mean time, stay your broke ass at Target you dumb fuck.