Branded Clothing

trash

unless it's wtaps or cavempt or undercover or neighborhood or something ofc :^)

wearing graphic shirts pretty much for athleisure mongs and normies, and shallow branding like this is much worse
blame instagram for popularlizing adidas/nike uniforms

>>12533409
LOOK. HERE IS THE DEAL.
You must first ask yourself TWO questions before buying anything with a brand plastered on it.

1. Would you wear it if it didn't have the branding? - Well in this case it's just a green t-shirt so no, whatever fashion 'value' it's held is gone now. For instance, if supreme made hoodies that didn't have the bogo, no faggot would wear them.

2. In the event that the branding is the key feature of the article as featured above, (muh design) then you'll have to ask yourself this question instead. Would you wear it still if nobody had heard of it? Here you'll have to convince yourself that you like Adidas for the 'design' of the logo rather than its hype and I can tell you that it's not going to work.

To summarise, stop dressing like a faggot and get a taste of your own. Stop being a billboard.

>>12533409
I never buy anything that's branded. It looks vulgar and tryhard to me. It's also the opposite of what I believe fashion is about. Sometimes it's a bit burdensome though, for instance I would love to wear some BBS pieces but I simply cannot get over the gigantic "11"

I wear adidas sneakers but that's the only piece of clothing I have branded. I would probably wear an adidas shirt though if the cut wasn't so shit.

no visible branding, period.