Would you wear these fakes? Have a few fits for them, but hate the company and wouldnt spend 800 on tall slippers
>>12472260
The logo on the fakes fade away
>>12472290
Scotch guard?
>>12472260
the only reason you would ever own this sketcher trash is because its expensive, objectively they are shit shoes.
these aren't even expensive so whats the point
>>12472290
On the real thing the letters literally just fall off. It's kind of common.
God no. I'd rather wear city socks, or tubular dooms.
>>12472260
why would you wear fake anything.
>>12472592
Some people want the look but cant afford it. Some people want to look like they have money but dont. Some people dont give a fuck
>>12472626
broke bois
>>12472626
i understand, really. i personally don't see the point, but to each his own.
>>12472626
https://www.zara.com/us/en/man/shoes/sneakers/high-top-black-sock-sneakers-c358062p4298029.html
>>12472592
>>12472626
>>12472644
Some people want the look and like to spend their money wisely.
W2c fakes?
dope shoe, wouldnt spend retail though
if you're stupid enough to think these look good, i encourage you to get the fakes
>>12472721
Oh lord. the soles are disgusting
it's the kind of shoe that looks nice in pictures but works in maybe 1 out of 50 fits
>>12472721
dang i wish the soles were different these are freaking me out
Cop the nike mercurial
>>12472721
what is the quality of zara?
if you like the "sock on white styrofoam" look, why not go for these?
>>12474672
Because they're uglier?
>>12473528
Abysmal.
>>12472294
I mean I don't like the shoes either but something's visual appeal is something purely subjective and when you say it's objectively shit, you undermine your own opinion by being objectively wrong
>>12472721
I unironically like this. It somehow has more detail to me than the balenciaga shoes. I probably wouldn't buy it even if it didn't fall apart in a month though.
>>12473208
These are more my taste