Dickies 874 General

>>12451811
Eyyy esé core

>>12451831
I only see white people wear dickies.

>>12451922
its standard fare for cholos in california

File: 11119187_10152750478221574_1841321402_n.jpg (19KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 800x533px

>>12451811
too roomy, 872 where it's at

>>12451942
but are they high rise?

>>12451942
Clothes are meant to be regular fit.

>>12451811
What to wear with dickies ? I see people position them as 'chinos' but they're not really chinos. Like what kind of aesthetics does dickies fit in ?

>>12451993
in the past, yes

i don't like skinny stuff, but too roomy either, 872 is the perfect middle ground, 874 is just too roomy below the knees, the whole silhouette is dumb, it looks really awkward how it falls onto the shoe

but if yo insist on the regular fit, pic related 873 is more pleasing aesthetically than the 874

File: 7913846-1-black.jpg (46KB, 513x655px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 513x655px

>>12452035

>>12451995
I wear them everyday to my job with a buttonup and tie. I also wear them with a fruit of the loom shirt the weekends.

You can do whatever you want with them. They are superior to jeans in everyway.

>>12452035
>>12451942
>>12451982
BUT ARE THEY HIGH RISE?!

Can you get rid of the grandad crease down the front of the legs, or is it permanently pressed in?

FUCK SAKE, ARE 872 HIGH RISE?

>>12452093
Let me Google that for you

>>12452090
They are broken in after like three washes.

>>12451982
>>12452046
>>12452093
holy fuck you are the worst thing ever to happen to this board. fat lazy slobs who are so inept that they cannot take the 5 seconds it takes to google the answer to their stupid fucking questions before they clog the board with their retarded posts. it literally would take a fraction of the time to google the answer to your question than it would be to type it here, fill out a captcha, and then wait for an answer. you are a fucking retard. kill yourself.

>>12452111
But are they high rise?

>>12452035
that's all pretty arbitrary. straight fit pants are safe and look fine on almost anyone.

and as the other guy suggests, low rise clothing is pretty unbearable

>>12452035
They are not as baggy as they feel.

They look like pants, no one will think they are baggy unless you are just skeleton mode.

>>12452035
Regular fit clothes are made to look ideal and safely good. It was made to accomodate any kind of shapes. The motivation wasn't degenerate. Nowadays, clothes (and arts) are made to be as provocative as possible.

>>12452319
>low rise clothing
god i hate low rise t shirts

>low rise skinny jeans

Want to buy some 872 but they don't do them in 30L and even that measurement is too long for my legs.

>>12452035
Sorry, but you are Wrong.

Having tighter fit pants lowers mobility and comfort. Try spreading your legs while sitting in 872's then do it in 874. It's night and day.

The 874 are not baggy. They are not Jincos it 90s/ early 2000s jeans. They just fit like pants are supposed to.

You they don't make you look fat or weird.

Skinny pants are a fad.

>>12453143
Then get 30R you dunce.

File: 1.jpg (105KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 800x500px

>>12451831

>>12453168
Yes I will, but did you read that they'd be fucking ginormous on me

>>12453144
When I wear 874s it feels like I have enough fabric flopping around my legs for three pairs or pants. Yeah, sure the rise is nice, but they are so baggy on me I look like a skinny white cholo wannabe. If I'm wearing Dickies it's either the 801 or 873. I don't care about the lower rise, 874s sit about the same on me anyway.

>wearing dickies
>not skating

pick one /fa/

>>12453227
>Wearing Dickies
>Having a job of any kind.

Im currently wearing navy Dickies, a white shirt and tie.

>>12453218
Do squats.

>>12453240
>wearing dickies
>having a job that isn't manual

pick one m8

Why dickies when you can buy regular chinos? Dickies are made of a shitty poly/cotton blend with pleb styling.

>>12453317
>>12453317
>High rise
>Pleb style

Pick one. Find me high rise Chinos that are not Dickies.

They don't exist.

>>12453361
There are plenty of high rise chinos out there. You just might need to slim down the legs if they're too baggy. O'connells, Brooks Brothers, Lands End, LLBean, etc. all have high rise pants.

>monstrous belt loops
>not pleb

>>12453365
>>12453365
The thick belt loops are Kino.

File: IMG_2105.jpg (58KB, 734x734px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 734x734px

>>12453361
Uniqlo trousers. Was on sale for 10$ in all sizes. You can stil cop them if you're in Europe.

>>12453410
Fucking awful.

File: imcia.jpg (66KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 750x1000px

>>12451811

>>12453259
>it doesn't matter how awful they are in every other regard, they have muh high rise

>>12453535
>>it doesn't matter how awful they are in every other regard, they have muh high rise

>Tough material
>comfy
>high rise
>good overall, professional fit.
>$20

Nothing awful about them. They are the best value pants on the market.

File: dickies874_reshoot_tan_138[1].jpg (247KB, 1732x2200px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1732x2200px

>>12454059
>>12453535

>>12453218
if 874s actually sit that low on you then that's a sizing issue. it would also explain the "bagginess".

>>12454059

Do they come in 30x34?

>>12451811
>look amazing

>wanting to look like you do manual labor

w2c in europ without paying 60$?

File: shit.jpg (469KB, 1000x700px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1000x700px

I assume that Dickies is the new meme ?

Seriously how can you say that this looks good ?

Wait a second. Is getting them to the tailor and ordering them tapered an option or it doesn't work with the cut/material or something?
Once they're tapered they seem to be a perfect replacement for those baggy 80s "carrot" pants

>>12454949
Agreed, he needs some skin tight leggings style Chino nut huggers that are low rise.

>>12454949
>New
The guy is wearing them wrong, he needs to pull his pants up and tuck his shirt in.

>he wears the virgin trousers

>>12455085
trv

You fucking kids disgust me.

>>12454059
$20?
saw some the other day for £45

>>12454949
newfag

>>12455083
>I need high rise to cover my fat stomach

>>12455219
sorry you live in some shithole

File: good.jpg (305KB, 1044x1380px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 1044x1380px

>>12455083
Or he just needs a trouser that fit him well ? Why tf do you try that hard being funny

>>12455220
Stfu go back to /r/streetwear

>>12455282
that picture is actually disgusting lmao

pants like that simply shouldn't exist, he's 40% torso. his feet look massive.

>>12451811
>>12451942
I really can't get ho chuck works. In the first image they look complete shit but in the second one they fit very nice. What's the secrete?

>>12453144
I pretty much have full range mobility in every pair of slim fitting pants I own.
Maybe you're just an inflexible fatty who needs grandpa jeans so your flabby legs aren't noticeable ;))

>>12455500
dickies aren't jeans

>>12455221
>I'm too fat to wear high waisted pants because my gut is bug.

Other way around, high rise looks better if you are fit and trim. You really think a fat Fuck would look better in these? Wearing them near his belly button?

>>12455500
You crawl around servers, squat lift stuff in your girl leggings?

Sounds like you are wearing elastic pants.

How do I stop piling in the pockets?

>>12451922
you're under 18

>>12455834
I'm 29 and live in Texas. I only see people older then me wearing Dickies.

So are Dickies more comfortable than jeans?

Do they breathe better?

And also, are there any flat front ones? Because I kind of hate pleats and creases.

Do they have anything high rise in slim or skinny fit?

>>12451811
Are these light enough for summer heat? Probably not..

Anyone know a pant that fits a nice, relaxed fit, is comfy, and is breathable and light enough to wear in the summer? I'm all "slimmed out" and I can't wear slim jeans anymore, I'm rebelling and going for a loose fit, relaxed summer look this year

>>12455859
No, but they should not be too baggy if worn properly. Skinny high rise would legit make you look like a girl, I don't know anyone who makes them for guys.
>>12455856
They probably breath just as much as jeans, they are only comfortable after you wash them a few times, they are stiff when you first get them. They are not pleated, the creases go away over time, just washing and wearing gets rid of the pleats

So can you or can't you hem dickies?

File: IMG_2502.jpg (995KB, 4896x3264px) Image search: [Google]

995KB, 4896x3264px

>>12456015

>>12455973
You can hem dickies. I've heard of people going all out and tapering the legs ect.

Generally, you shouldn't have to taper them because they have great size selection.

>>12451811
I tried these on recently and they are very uncomfortable. They also make your legs look like stacks of paint cans which I suppose is fitting because the only time you should wear these is when you are painting.

I'd rather wear Old Navy cargo pants.

>>12456266
of course they're going to be uncomfortable the very first time you try them on lmao they're work pants. if you had actually worn them for more than five minutes you'd realize they soften almost immediately after washing.
>stacks of paint cans
wtf

>>12455491
the pants and on the second pic they're beat

>>12456020
w2c shirt on right?

>>12453144
the 872 is not a skinny pant, have you seen skinny pants or everything which is not as baggy as the 874 is considered skinny in your book? the 872 is slim at best, which doesn't restrict you in anything while giving you a better silhouette, if it does restrict you, you bought a size smaller than you should or just skip leg days
Dickies too have skinnier than the 872, it's the 801 or the 803

the 872 is the ideal middle ground between too baggy (874) and too skinny (801, 803)

>>12456020
DUDE WE ARE NOT POSING AT ALL LMAO

>>12456183
The 872 only do regular leg and I'm a short unfortunately.

>>12456732
this

>>12452090
iron them dick head

>>12452035
Your primary argument against 874s is that they are "just too roomy below the knees" however you go on to recommend 873s over them, even though 873s actually have the exact width at the cuff.

You are wrong, plain and simple.

P.S. describing a silhouette as "dumb" is dumb.

>>12456801
Ya, you are going to want 874s

>>12457176
I want slim dickies not the ones big enough for my whole family and dog

>>12457204
Wrong. If you are as short as you claim, you want pants that fit and you want them high rise. You should be wearing your 28inseem Dickies at your belly button.

It should make you look taller.

>>12457349
I don't care if it makes me look taller I've only just turned 18 and embarrassingly enough still going through puberty. I just want slim dickies

>>12457370
just get some generic h&m/gap/etc pants then, there's no difference and they're cheaper anyway

>>12457587
No

>>12457370
Just get 872 and hem them.

I don't see how that is hard.

>>12457659
I will sir.

File: justin-timberlake- 1.jpg (98KB, 500x800px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 500x800px

>>12453125
>>12452677
>>12452319
Low rise slim-straight jeans, like they did at the turn of the millenium
Feels good man

>>12453361
Gap, I promise. They have vintage fits now and then

>>12457929
how abhorrent

>>12457929
also notoriously the worst period for fashion

File: pemberton-10.jpg (40KB, 266x400px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 266x400px

>>12458059
True
But anyone who looked good in 2008 looks really good now

>>12458074
pharrell always been on his shit

>>12451811
where do people buy 872s in the states?

I've managed to rip at least 4 pairs of Dickies.

And this is coming from someone who actually uses them for work, not as a fashion statement.

I can't fucking believe they can't even serve their original purpose.

File: idontknowduhwutduhidontknow.jpg (33KB, 363x384px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 363x384px

>>12458366
874 at the store
872 shame on you

File: youknowme.jpg (13KB, 172x167px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 172x167px

>>12458564
It's just like pictures in a book. It isn't real.

>>12458564
>>12458589
samefagger

File: skin deep.jpg (64KB, 702x336px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 702x336px

>>12458598
no, we only look the same.

>tfw I've been wearing dickies brands for long time
>come visit /fa/
>dickies general

Welp, I wear

>874
I also a pair that is loose fit with double knee padding or whatever. I work in a kitchen and those pants are nice.

I use to buy the shorts, but I can't find any my size locally, so I bought these wrangler cargo shorts
>cargo shorts

I don't browse effay all that much.

>>12451811
Those are a work pant. Designed for manual labor, not fashion.
Those aren't even mid rise, lol kys

>>12456301
Do you not know what paint cans are?

>>12455282
w2c similar trousers?

>>12460413
the mall

>>12458861
Lol what?

>>12458861
jeans were designed for manual labor too, are you gonna stop wearing those?

>>12460421
very helpful, thanks

>>12458861
They're not designed for "manual labor", they're designed for uniforms, some of which involve light labor, but most of which involve just delivering shit or driving. Real manual labor clothing is jeans or jumpsuits.

I've been sneaking dickies 874 in at my professional-attire office job since I like the fit, fabric and durability better than dress pants. I carefully cut off the dickies tag in the back and so far so good.

>>12460450
Same.

>>12452040
Dude How the fuck do I get the folds as sturdy as this? I got a black pair that are the same size as my others ones but black is always an inch or two too long. The folds never stay creased and end up rolling down after a few minutes of walking.

>>12460650
maybe you could try ironing them

Are there any effay Carhartt trousers kind of equivalent to Dickies?

HELLO 2006

File: pants.jpg (79KB, 578x1200px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 578x1200px

https://eu.rvca.com/shop/product/pants/the-week-end-stretch-pant?color=0019

anyone ever fuck with these? Local skate store has em for £40 and they seem pretty nice.

>>12461918
looks like shite desu

>>12460650
you could try using iron on fabric glue stuff

>>12460650
use starch and paperclips when ironing. Ask your grandma or some other oldtimer if you dont know how.

>>12461918
try them on and see what you think?

>>12461918
1. go to store
2. put it on your body
3. if the satisfaction-to-cost ratio is high, buy pants
4. if the satisfaction-to-cost ratio is low, walk away

Just got 872 and man, they look pretty shit on me. I want to branch away from skinny jeans and something slimmer instead but they look horrendous on me. I'm usually a 30w but I could fit 2 of me inside these.

>>12464461
lmao post pic

File: IMG-20170513-WA0004.jpg (1009KB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1009KB, 3264x1836px

>>12464646
I got them second hand and on the left leg they're scraped to shit. Gonna open a case on depop

>>12464961
if you think these are loose i'd hate to see what you consider slim lol

>>12464976
I usually wear 803s. I think if I got a 29" then it'd look tons better but I'm also short. 5 8.

I just ordered a pair today, slim tapers. How are they?

>>12465055
bad

>>12465063
fuck it lol

>>12464961

They look fine. You are so fucking autistic.
Any thinner and you would like like a peter puffer.

>>12464961
Dont roll mane.

>>12466021
They're so big on the waist thought. I had to make another hole and the pants slip under the belt.

>>12466058
Was gonna hem them

>>12464961
it's your hips i'm sorry

>>12466271
pull them up.

>>12461694
Carhartt's WIP line has the Sid pant. Pretty slick looking trouser, if you ask me.
https://www.carhartt-wip.com/en/men-pants-chino/sid-pant-black-rinsed-3060_1?listID=epoq
Basically your standard chino. Build quality looks fantastic. A little slim for my taste, though.

>>12458837
Same here. Grew up in the inner city and money was tight. My pals and I would prefer to thrift our 874s so we didn't have to deal with that awkward, crazy-starched-out phase.

>>12467111
By starched out you mean the toughness? Got my first pair of 803 and they're stiff after a few washes still and tight on the seat. Guess just by washing that'll sort itself out.

And does anyone know how to prevent Pilling in the pockets?

>>12467551
Yep. Washing a fresh pair with vinegar a few times usually helps, but the fucking things practically stand up on their own when you first buy them. 803's a little too lean for my liking. How do you like the fit?
As far as pilling is concerned, turning the garments inside out before washing/folding/hanging can help. A delicate wash cycle will probably preserve the fabric, too. Kind of silly to pamper a $20 pair of slacks, but, meh, whatever works.

>>12467629
Fit pretty well, a little too skinny in my opinion but I'm used to wearing skinny jeans anyway and the 872s look pretty bad on me anyway.

>>12451922
That's a good thing.

File: 42234_DN_FR.jpg?sw=1563&sh=2000&sm=fit.jpg (243KB, 1563x2000px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1563x2000px

8inch shorts or 11inch cuffed?

>>12468339
8 inch cuffed

>>12468367
I'll start squatting.

They're great pants for the price but jeans are definitely more comfortable and durable

Been looking for something with a similar fit/color variety but all cotton. Are those Bonobo chinos any good?

>>12467111
The Sid is a nice pant and fits great on my skeleton legs, but the rise is a little low for me personally