Which house is the most effay >pic related

>House of Normies
K

dude obviously Ravenclaw is going to be the most effay. After that, Slytherin (trust fun kiddies all dressed in full rick or thom browne). Griffindor rounds up the first 3 and hufflepuff is the least effay
Even the name faintly suggests a slight obesity problem

File: newt-scamander.jpg (243KB, 640x594px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 640x594px

>>12419510
>>12419473
But,,, there is pic related.

>>12419523
he got kicked out so exception

>>12419523
is this movie worth watching? i watchesd all harry potters in cinema but this is the one i didnt feel compelled to watch, i know its not mainline but it looks so try hard and low budget

>>12419470
tumblrcore.

>>12420110
I really enjoyed watching it and would definitely recommend it if you liked the other 8.

>>12419470
>larping over a poorly written children's book

File: 1480194209347.jpg (3MB, 1565x2823px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1565x2823px

>>12419470
Neither house is effay, it certainly isnt " I am le quirky Hufflepuff weird person" and why would you even want to wear an item showcasing your love for the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>12420255
you better take wuthering heights off the bottom tier or i'll slug you in the head mate

>>12420255
>That pic
It has to be a joke, right? /Lit/ hasn't fallen that deep into contrarian pseudointellectualism, right?

>>12420255
>god-tier
>literally just a highschool forced reading list

did /v/ make this list?

>>12420255
>>>/lit/

>>12420418
>that tier list
>/lit/

>>12420255
i love you

>>12420255
Kek if there was ever an indication of underage
If not then top-tier bait. You could trigger all of /lit/

>>12420255
Memephen King is so fucking boring.

>>12419470
it can't be the nu-male/normie/cuck house because the books say that Cucklepuff are the softest faggots.

if it has not a bit of edge, it's not effay.