Best (cheap) underwear brand?

>>12391291
Uniqlo is pretty good. Feels like I'm not wearing anything desu

H&M underwear is really fucking good, I still have some from like 1.5-2yrs ago that I wear on a regular basis. Snug, cupping, and supportive.

GU is also really good. Interesting variety of texture, material, and colouration. Not sure if you can get in the US but I always get a few pair when I go back to Japan.

Haven't tried Uniqlo, every time I'm in the city when traveling I'd rather just go to H&M. Simlar products, but H&M has more in my size at better prices/sales.

t. japan pro and hm fangay

File: 103463_3_grande.jpg (20KB, 400x450px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 400x450px

CK all day everyday

>>12391291
H&M is super comfy mayn.

>>12391837
these

>>12391291
they're pretty tight around the crotch, even the boxer and boxer briefs, They're prettry comfortable material, butI wouldn't recommend

File: underwear.jpg (48KB, 513x655px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 513x655px

>>12391291
I got a lot of cheap stuff at asos
the hipsters are like boxer briefs except shorter and really snug and smooth

can't believe I wore the same saggy 3-4 pairs of ripped underwear for so long tbqh

>>12391291
Calvin klein.

I wear Ralph Lauren boxer briefs, they are extremely comfortable and were worth every penny. When getting underwear just use common sense, no whitey tighties or Walmart-core ones. The cheapest underwear you can find that are still acceptable are probably Jockey at your local Kohl's.

>>12392154
>like boxer briefs except shorter
They're called trunks anon

>>12391440

Agreed. The supima low rise briefs are great.

File: undies.png (491KB, 978x445px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 978x445px

>>12392580
well they sell stuff called trunks AND hipsters
the hipsters are shorter which are what I like more but I like the trunks too

>>12391291
Uniqlo Airism.

>>12391550
h&m and uniqlo basic underwear are basically the same but uniqlo airism underwear is t o p n o t c h

>>12393299
or the ASOS microfiber

>>12391550
>>12391934
how's the sizing on their (H&M's) underwear?
(I'm asking since I obviously can't try them on).

File: prod_1609653012?hei=333&wid=333&op_sharpen=1.jpg (14KB, 333x333px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 333x333px

These are pretty good, 3 for 10.

why does this need a thread
it's fucking underwear its all the same

>they dont wear briefs

SAD!

hm is good i've had them for a year now and nothing wrong wit them
dont buy asos though quality is really poor and i threw them away after a month or so

>>12391291
uniqlo airism all the way
cotton underwear is fucking garbage after these

>>12393341
I'm neither of those anons, but I used to wear H&M trunks. They fit pretty small. They were always on the brink of being too tight, but now I have gained a little size in the past couple years so my smalls don't fit me anymore. I haven't bought any of theirs in medium cause I ended up stocking up on a bunch of lacoste & calvin klein from TJ Maxx and Marshall's for pretty cheap.

>>12394697
these all the way. though they are significantly delicate versus cotton underwear