Name a better shoe.

Cons:
>look like clown shoes on average or larger feet
>holes develop very easily on canvas
>no arch support
>laces way too tightly when worn by people with narrow feet

File: memeemem.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x360px

>>12316230
you must be smoking crack if you think these are comfortable. I own this exact pair and I would die if I worked/walked more than a mile in em.

Cons:
>make running impossible and potentially debilitating
>make the wearer look like a theater kid from a disney movie high school
>constructed poorly out of low-quality materials
>thin, flimsy, even a single drop of water soaks through instantly
>obviously cannot be worn with shorts, unless we are considering the low tops as well, which have their own set of problems
Shall i go on

>>12316243
I wear them a size bigger. Yesterday I walked four miles in them and my feet feel fine.

File: crying wokaj.png (139KB, 547x582px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 547x582px

>tfw size 12
>own a pair of cons and know my feet look like clown shoes but still wear them

having big feet sucks bros

>>12316326
12 isn't that big dude, fuck off. It's just large, not huge. All shoemakers make at least up to your size. Though I wear 10.5/11
I knew a kid in middle school who wore size 14, now I felt sad for his hugeassfeet

>>12316243
I wear them to work everyday and I'm on my feet for ten hours straight.

>>12316230
Shoe that makes you look like an idiot
will give you flatfoot after x years.
kys, OP

>>12316326

try being size 17. at 5'5 i am a perfectly shaped L

>>12316349
KEK

>>12316349
post pic

The canvas monos are shitty pleb shit.

>>12316349
i refuse to believe someone like this exists

I shouldn't give you clues, it only elevates you children to my level. But oh well, i was feeling nice atm

>>12316349
wow

>>12316335
yes cons are perfectly fine.
Never had any trouble with them and i am 40 years old.

File: 1464045030066.png (68KB, 1417x1549px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1417x1549px

>>12316349
pls post pics

>>12316230
A better shoe would be
Reebok club C's
Vans old skools
Asics gel lytes
Air force 1s
Onitsuka tiger GSM

File: 12080616_1035433996474816_1603957612_n.jpg (44KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 640x640px

>>12316230
>>Comfy as fuck.

>>12316230
Anyone got 70's and how are they?

File: converse-chuck-taylor-all-star-2-03.jpg (109KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 960x640px

>>12316757
More durable than regulars, better looking soles.
Chuck II are same and have lunarlon which is comfy as fuck.

>made out of shit tier materials with shit tier build quality

And all you do is look normal

>>12316263
Pls what are low top disadvantages?

>>12316243
Bitch please, you must be smoking rocks

File: img_9008.jpg (115KB, 1280x851px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1280x851px

>>12316230
Sk8-Hi's are better in every single way.
Comfier, better build quality, unisex too, actually has a full white model, no shitty logo on the side, etc.

>>12316230
>Name a better shoe
Desert boots, duh

File: mKigmitU7JihZrLZ-sQTd9Q.jpg (6KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 225x225px

>>12316230
I'm more a fan of the classics.

>>12316511
That image gets me every time

>>12316231
ditto on no arch support, kills my feet walking between classes all day. Fuck these shoes if you need to walk anywhere

chucks are becoming too pricey for what is essentialy a piece of rubber with some canvas glued on

>>12317334
In Australia they cost at least $90. I really want a pair but I simply can't justify buying more expensive shoes, that might not even last or be comfortable

>>12316243
only people with weak little penguin feet say this, try walking more than once a week

>>12316230
These are great, I got chuck 2's and put some new balance insoles in them. Comfy as fuck.

>>12316230
clown shoes, it really looks terrible

>>12316230
How tf you run in these? Was running on track with these, they easily slowed me down 35% as well as tired me out faster.

>>12317552
You don't. It's like racing with a Model T. Chuck IIs seem like an improvement though.

File: 20170212_193342.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

>>12316230
:^)

File: converse-womens-converse-womens-shoes-all-star-high-black-leather-43512.jpg (34KB, 650x453px)

34KB, 650x453px

I have these leather ones are they effay?

>>12318549
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

File: spurdo.png (117KB, 1024x749px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1024x749px

>>12318549
>Jussi-sukat

Jaa kato moro :D

>>12318849
veljen kenkulit oikeasti kuvassa, omat 1490-varsimaiharit eivät yhtä paskassa kunnossa ole.

File: Raf Simons velcro high-top 2006.jpg (98KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1000x667px

bow down plebs

>>12316875
Uuugly.

>>12316230
the 70s are superior, regular ones are trash