How legit is this?

>>12264400

Supreme and Bape deserves to be on the bottom. Meanwhile, why the fuck is raf simons in the shit tier?

>>12264400
>y-3 shit tier
>h&m mid tier

>>12264400
>top
>APC

Who made this garbage list

>nike
>adidas
>shit tier
ok

>Raf Simons: shit-tier
>Norse Projects: god-tier
>Ray-ban: top-tier

Not too legit.

>>12264431
>Ray-ban: top-tier
>implying

>God
>no CCP

Dropped.

File: fa-tshirts.jpg (363KB, 1356x1823px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 1356x1823px

any kind of infographic you read on /fa/ is satire

>Hollister
>Not in God tier
Don't you want to look like a middleschool Chad?

>>12264459
>The person that originally made this wasn't joking

>>12264400
>all mid tier brands in the top
>luxury and designers at the bottom

whoever made this seems to be a little bit triggered about his financial situation.

>>12264400
>midtier
>h&m
dropped

>>12264466

Middle school chad is now wearing vineyard vines and nike roshes and nike elite socks nowadays.

It's an alright idea for a starter, but most of the listings in the shit tier, you can tell it's been written by someone who hasn't used those brands. Or, at least has a very simplistic view of what makes a brand good.

Man that list has got to be at least 5 years old. Not terribly inaccurate, but definitely behind the times.

>>12264893
>Or, at least has a very simplistic view of what makes a brand good
Also very likely.

>>12264910
It says 2011 at the bottom.

>>12264400
>comme des carcons
nice troll