were can i find a very plain, cheap and one-coloured watch? has to be digital and has to have seconds (date obtional). not visibly casio
pic related, but no seconds
>>12263173
in the watch general you daft cunt
>>12263188
fuck you. I make threads how I see fit
>>12263173
f91w
>>12263466
>f91w
I explicitely ruled out Casio. The (blue) border is a quasi-branding too
>>12263545
you could try those rubber band watches by IO?ION. seconds are not visible though but I think there is a mode to look them up on the watch. I think it got the date too.
they're a total meme and on amazon.
they got other watches too.
>>12263571
maybe this model is more to your liking as well.
>>12263173
You might like this its minimal steampunk, one colour theme, it is actually digitally powered and does have seconds and date! Congratulations
>>12263745
I actually own one of these. it sucks.
not by Winner though but they use the same templates.
>>12263574
>>12263571
>>12263745
sorry but those are terrible
>>12263745
>minimal steampunk
>digitally powered
what a fucking abomination. don't tell me you'd unironically wear that for anything other than cosplay purposes
>>12263745
>spirit level
what the fuck hahaha
>>12263173
I found this after some searching online, they're super cheap and come in many colours.
>>12263959
Also found this one, it's more rounded, but also cheap and one colour.
>>12263173
buy Swatch Touch
not only they have seconds - seconds are twice as big as hours and minutes
>>12263970
Another cheap watch.
>>12264003
Looks like I can't find more than this that's actually cheap.
>>12263986
This is the best in this thread so far imo.
>>12263173
>41Q59WI1suL.jpg
what is this watch OP!?
>>12265559
Google image search tells me it's a German watch by the brand name Oramics.
The exact name they give it is "Extrem flache Herren-Armbanduhr Digital".
>>12263173
>>12263571
>>12263574
>>12263745
>>12263959
>>12263970
>>12263986
>>12264003
>>12264016
you're joking, right?
>>12265680
OP said not visibly Casio.
Which is why we can't find any good watches.
>>12265680
What's wrong with any of those you fucking meme? They fit OPs criteria.
>>12265691
they're the direct opposite what OP wants
he said very plain, those are stuffed with functions, he said no visible Casio logo, those watches all contain the logo
>>12265695
I think he was talking about the posts the casio guy replied to.
>>12263173
why can't you buy what just showed us, op?
https://www.amazon.de/Digital-Sport-Armbanduhr-Herren-Schwarz/dp/B005K87V22
also i really like this idea of superminimalistic super cheap watch
>>12263910
the 2nd IO?ION I posted seems to show seconds progressing in a cicrcle and digital too if you look closely. but it can't be helped if you don't like them. I never owned one anyway.
>>12265680
I've got the one on far right and it's dope
>>12263959
Oh, I actually overlooked this one.
Will buy this. Thanks for the help!