Vintage fashion

get what?
there's like a million different things going on in that pic
not to mention none of it is probably vintage

>>12225305
I mean vintage shit from the 30's or before.

For example that bandana thing on his neck. Never seen that in a store before

>>12225311

That's an ascot tie, and if you weren't a plebeian you'd know it.

>>12225311
Apparently people from the 30's wore modern slim jackets and 50mm watches?

File: ascot - cravat.jpg (140KB, 1226x472px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1226x472px

>>12225395
it's a cravat, and if you weren't a plebeian you'd know it
ascots go around the collar of your shirt and in then in front of it, cravats go around your neck and then inside your shirt

>>12225492

"Ascot" is used for both in my language

If I weren't a non-native speaker I'd know it :^)

>>12225297
jacket too tight lapel too thin is that an oxford wth

Just add a sepia tone to your pictures

I have no issue with vintage-inspired fashion but every single aspect here is something you should not do

>>12225297
damn thats cringe

>>12226042
>>12226042

>>12225520
It's not about being a non-native speaker, it's about not being a plebeian and knowing the English language.
But how would you know, you're fine with broken English.

>>12225492
Burger detected
The left is a cravat, the right is a day cravat or ascot. The knot on the cravat on the left was at one point called an "ascot tie" (this was before "a tie" was the name of a garment), but that's fallen out of use. Regular cravats can also be tied in a ruche tie, which is basically a four-in-hand knot ("ruche" means wrinkled or scrunched, because the knot part comes out looking wrinkled due to how wide the blade is), or a cravat tie, which is basically the way that day cravat on the right is tied—you flop one blade over on the front, but on a formal cravat you tie it over your shirt and then peg it down with a stick pin.

You're the mong here, kid.