Can /fa/ make a non-shook adidas?

File: IMG_1554.jpg (104KB, 750x1144px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 750x1144px

NIKE SHOOK AF

File: uce.jpg (45KB, 600x447px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x447px

>>12192006
fuck you. this isthe only ice purple that matters

File: ss+(2017-01-29+at+01.32.26).png (158KB, 709x499px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 709x499px

rate

>shook
Speak english, we know you're white.

>>12192014
>>12192006
the day nike was shook

>>12192014
0/nike

>>12192076
t. jordans nigger

>>12191992
Shook?

File: D perfect sneaker.png (173KB, 574x479px)

173KB, 574x479px

this is D. Perfect Sneaker

>>12192198
sort of want

File: hghgs.png (142KB, 467x472px)

142KB, 467x472px

>>12191992
i can't make these not look ugly

>>12192220
flames

File: adidas-ZX-500-OG-Clear-Grey-Bliss-Purple-Dark-Marine-2.jpg (35KB, 620x430px)

35KB, 620x430px

does adidas have a customization for the older zx models

File: ss+(2017-01-29+at+03.28.42).png (133KB, 720x493px)

133KB, 720x493px

all black everything

>>12192220
they look better when you zoom in
zoomed out looks ugly for everything

why does /fa/ love black culture so much?

>>12191992
The basic test of any sneaker is if it doesn't look good with
>all black upper, white soles and white laces
it's not very good design

>>12192220
would look pretty good with white soles i think

>>12192304
Fast food worker sneakers