Thoughts?

>people don't seem to like it when we copy adidas so let's try reebok now

>>12177622
Might very well buy these. I like the Air Pegasus and I like CDG.

nike headquarters should be bombed to ash
well, worked out well for japan

>>12177622
Ugly silhouette.
Made to milk out money.

>>12177633
dafuq are you on about? Nike has the Pegasus since 1983, oddly the Reebok Classic is also from '83

btw it's no worse than Raf Stans in terms of creativity

>>12177681
you are a true fashion victim

>>12178294
raf stans are GOAT

>>12177622
I like them, overpriced though

i mean
theyre just regular black shoes pretty much

okay shoe
absolutely terrible collab

>>12177622
I can only imagine hypebeasts and asians wearing these

File: image.jpg (108KB, 1200x666px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1200x666px

>>12178294
thinking raf stans are the same as regular stans is actually a misconception. a big difference is the silhouette. as you can see from the pictures the regular stans are quite bulbous compared to the sleeker raf ones. another is the use huger quality leather. the differences are really minute but theyre there.

They don't look like anything special.

>>12177622
wtf

blacs are going to start a riot over the pegasus

>>12178794
youre baiting right? they look exactly the same, and in the picture where they dont its because its not even the same angle

wtf

>>12178868
take a closer look at the midsection of the shoes. a big hint is the tongue. the rafs are slimmer than the regular.

>>12178496
How much?

>>12178868
>they look exactly the same
Sesame Street have have been difficult for you