What brands are leading this aesthetic?

Bump?

plsguys

>>12165736
>starting a fashion-related thread
Never gonna last

>>12165837
So can you confirm that this is indeed a fast-fashion independent brand?

I'd like to know what brands they're ripping off of in regards to the loose fit aesthetic they're going with now

badump-tssss

>>12165856
I have no idea about anything having to do with the brand you posted. I was just saying that threads designed to spark discussion about specific fashion-related subjects don't last long here because people would rather ask "AM I BALDING?!," "IS THIS EFFAY?!?," "DO I LOOK LIKE A MODEL?!?!?," "IS (insert generic mall brand) WORTH THE PRICE?!?!?!?," etc.
I was just making a half-hour; sorry to disappoint you.

>>12165946
is my thread effayyy?

>>12165736
that's weird .. I know one of these models

you could probably get some stuff like this from lemaire

it's not really biting DIRECTLY off of any brands aesthetic, but you could find alternatives to most of these pieces if you shopped around some high end boutiques

>>12166023
Yeah I thought Lemaire had to have been one of the brands that influenced them but Lemaire is more chic in a sense while these guys have a more grunge/edgy feel to them.

Still, the textures and patterns remind me of Nigo's works but the silhouette is less straightforward than Japanese looks.

If these guys really arent complete ripoffs I guess I'll still go with them.

>>12165736
Reminds me of recent seasons of undercover

bump for more insight

bump again