My brother gave me a Burberry Watch he picked up after a fight at a strip club. He thought it didn't work but he's just dumb.
Anyways, after looking it up I found out it's a 800 dollar watch but it's listed as a woman's watch. Is that a problem for me to wear? It doesn't look feminine, it's massive.
Pic related. Model number is filename
>YEAR TWOTHOUSAND TWENTY.
>WEARING WATCHES.
>>12159384
but they look nice if they aren't digital
>>12159394
SO, YOU WOULD WEAR ANYTHING, REGARDLESS OF FUNCTIONALITY, OR NECESSITY, AS LONG AS IT "SEEMS NICE"?
>>12159397
like.. why even wear clothes in the first place.
>>12159394
get the fuck out faggot digital watches are effay as fuck
>>12159416
BECAUSE THEY ARE NECESSARY, FOR US HUMANS, TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST THE ELEMENTS —AGAINST NATURE.
>>12159397
>>12159425
POSTPUNK AF
>>12159397
You are on a fashion board.
>>12159397
>>12159422
Fuck off from this board, then.
>>12159422
Not since the advent of the house.
>>12159460
YES, I AM.
WHAT IS YOUR "POINT"?
>>12159470
Some people value aesthetics over functionality. For example, of course a Ferrari is less economical and you can't drive/leave it the places you can drive a Honda, but people will buy it because they like the way it looks/functions on the inside
Plus fashion is somewhat about creating an identity for yourself by distinguishing yourself with products. Watches are similar
>>12159474
>Some people value aesthetics over functionality.
1. AESTHETICS, AND UTILITY, ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE, NOR MUTUALLY OPPOSITE.
2. PREFERRING APPEARANCE, WHILST NEGLECTING, OR DISREGARDING, FUNCTION, IS NOT AN ACT OF AESTHETICS OVER UTILITY, BUT AN ACT OF FRIVOLITY AND VANITY.
>For example, of course a Ferrari is less economical and you can't drive/leave it the places you can drive a Honda, but people will buy it because they like the way it looks/functions on the inside
THAT ANALOGY IS INAPT.
>Plus fashion is somewhat about creating an identity for yourself by distinguishing yourself with products.
1. FASHION IS THE STUDY AND CRAFT OF DRESS.
2. IDENTIFYING ONESELF WITH SOMETHING EXTERNAL TO ONESELF IS AN ACT OF ONTOLOGICAL FALSITY.
IF SOMEONE IDENTIFIES HIMSELF/HERSELF WITH WHAT HE/SHE WEARS, THAT PERSON HAS FORGOTTEN HIMSELF/HERSELF, CONSEQUENTLY, PERSONALITY WOULD BE NULL —IDENTITY, AND PERSONALITY, ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE AND OPPOSITE.
>>12159499
you win this round you fuck
>$800
And I bet it has a $2 Chinese made quartz movement.
>"""fashion"""" watches
>>12159512
Pretty sure Fossil makes them, so yeah.
Nice going getting a dressed up Wal-Mart watch.
>>12159378
Why'd you post this in /r9k/?
>>12159384
>>12159397
>>12159422
>>12159470
>>12159499
>havent been on /fa/ for a year
>come back
>see this
oh man so it wasnt just me? This board really is getting worse?
>edgy a e s t h e t i c meaningless band wagon name
>only posts in capital letters
>probably only fucking writes numbers in roman numerals too, right?
> a e s t h e t i cc lmao
I used to work at a watch store
Half the time guys would pick female watches and would be all over them. I can't even remember how many times it's happened a lot of times because they were more interested in "ice", we usually say "oh, I thought you were shopping for your girl". Anyways, wear whatever you like, more guys than you think wear girls watches. If you're at a place, ask lol