Are black chelseas kill
bamp
>>12146579
yes
>>12146654
are you fucking retarded?
>>12146684
Yes
>>12146689
>yes
>>12146579
When will this meme end? It's fucking stupid. You might as well ask "are shoes out?"
>>12146579
Only to hypebeasts
never liked them
I went out today and they are like 80% of the shoes I saw on women. So I'd say yeah they're dead in terms of being innovative with your fashion if you're a girl.
>>12146579
white t-shirts are kill as well...
Are charcoal suits kill guys?
xD
>>12146579
w2c?
>>12146579
Only rejects & manlets will say no to this.
Wat if I'm not a total manlet, 5'10" and I'm really slim (think XC runner physique). I think they could work really well w/black 510s etc? Am I an autist for thinking this?
faggy
>>12149826
Nah.
>>12149845
Nah like autism or nah like not autism
>>12147608
ok what do I wear then
>>12149931
It wasn't autistic until you had to ask.
>>12150284
tru
>>12147608
>>12146579
Should these be worn in width D? Seems like Men's chelseas are less sleek
There chelseas dude, been around for a hundred years, probably won't ever go out of style.
>>12146579
I personally prefer the oxford shoe
>>12146579
if you're a trendhopper that gives a shit yes
>>12151404
don't see how that's related to chelseas
I prefer nike air maxes
>>12149826
>5'10"
>not a total manlet
This is what you look like, you're not in the middle...
w2c black leather chelseas that aren't shit
>>12149826
would look fine but i recommend different slim fit pants the rise is really bad with 510s
>>12152906
like wat
>>12152869
Kekd cuz it's tru
>>12146579
Look OP,
If you can wear them with your fit, and i mean WEAR them without looking like a complete fuck, then get yourself a pair and wear them till they fall apart. If not, don't even think about it. I can't wear them with anything and that's why i don't own any, but anyone who can wear them and doesn't look like a complete autist should wear them.
>>12146579
never
>>12146579
Only if you want them to be.
>>12146579
Classic and less of a meme item than tan suede chelseas, so no
>>12152878
RM Williams.