Give me one good reason why I shouldn't wear a square tie.

>YEAR TWOTHOUSAND TWENTY.
>WEARING TIES.

It was a fad in the 60s; I have like ten Rooster ties that my grandpa wore to work as a chemist (they're all full of dorky math and chemistry prints)
And again about four years ago

>>12140284
>not having a job that requires a tie
Have fun being poor.

>>12140296
loan officers make shit and have to wear ties lol

>>12140278
as long as it's a tie appropriate occasion there's no reason not to. unless you're really fat maybe.

>>12140296

SO, ACCORDING TO YOUR LOGIC:

1. ONLY PERSONS WHO ARE REQUIRED TO WEAR TIES AT THEIR JOB WEAR TIES.

2. ALL PERSONS WHO ARE REQUIRED TO WEAR TIES AT THEIR JOB ARE NOT "POOR".

...

>>12140310
Note the space for a third bullet point but a lack of a third point to speak of required him to fill that space with ellipsis.

>>12140330
Retard

>>12140333
Sick 5th grade burn bro.

>>12140278
You'll look like a millennial

>>12140344

DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT A "MILLENNIAL" IS? I DO NOT THINK SO.

>>12140347
Seriously, im op of that watch thread, do you spend all day here? Dont you have anything better to do?

>>12140347
I don't think you know how to turn caps off

>>12140284
>Being this basic.
>Being a namefag.
>Being a faggot.

You never cease to amaze.

>>12140278
because it looks like you're wearing a belt from a bathrobe.

>>12140278
square ties look great. but the one in pic looks like crap material and looks worn the tiniest bit too long

>>12140278
Well, for one thing, that one's rectangular.

>>12140310
That's incorrect.
According to his logic
> all jobs that don't require a tie are poor
That's it, don't read more into it, it's a common mistake