Is transgerder /fa/

>>12129355
No

>>12129355
Is transgender a mental disorder*

No you fucking confused faggot

>>12129355
No
>>12129367
Yes

>>12129373

>>12129355
We all are human and race is just skin deep. Praise progress!

go ahead

>>12129367
yes
>>12129355
no

>>12129562
cancer can also be just skin deep
it'll fucking kill you all the same

>>12129355
Activist types - especially the transgender type ones - tend to be really behind on fashion, actually. Always these black hair with crimson/purple streaks straight out of 2004, or lame turquise or blue hair dye, and really shabby leftovers from yesterday's punk and indie fashions, etc. But that is to say that a lot of transgender people are pretty lame, fashionwise.

Worst are probably fat acceptance activists though, still holding onto that 50s revival punkabilly look from the late 90s.

There are fashionable queers, but they often seem to be kind of fierce amoral aestheticist types rather than annoying activists.

>>12129367
Literally yes according to the APA

>>12129355
how is this even a question? couldn't anyone be /fa/ regardless of gender or sexual condition? Yes, transgender is fa, so are human beings.

Jesus, is the 21st century, people.

>>12129355
It's the current meme trend so no. It's the same as when being depressed and having bipolar was trendy 10 years ago.

What will the next trend be?

>>12129355
Homosexuality can be /fa/, trying to be something you're obviously not can't

no it's an illness

>>12130146
i mean, come on, it's 2017

File: IMG_0509.jpg (237KB, 887x1280px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 887x1280px

Nah, waists are too big

>>12130717
kleiner syndrome

>>12129906
If it's skin deep, it won't

Being transgender is so 2016

>>12129355
i don't know anon, IS chris-chan /fa/?