Is this particular person /fa/?

File: 1370399562555.png (514KB, 597x598px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 597x598px

>>12117347

File: 1433822927944.png (603KB, 593x595px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 593x595px

>>12117364

File: 1470688620539.png (726KB, 596x596px) Image search: [Google]

726KB, 596x596px

>>12117370

File: 1483678903943.png (463KB, 597x599px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 597x599px

>>12117375

File: 1468828407074.png (720KB, 597x597px) Image search: [Google]

720KB, 597x597px

>>12117378

>>12117347
this person is conclusive proof that ugly girls are far more /fa/ than attractive ones

>>12117347
not /fa/
rest is passable except for the last few ones
>>12117434
and do you even know what ugly means

>>12117370
>>12117375
>>12117380
absolutely adorable

her style is so unoriginal, walk in any major city centre in the UK and girls all wear the exact same outfits. this croptop shit with flaired pants/jeans has to end. and those shoulder cut shirts with a choker, weew lad.

She looks like every other basic hoe

>>12117441
Personally I feel like she looks like a 2000s throwback.
The present ubiquitous basic bitch uniform appears to be all black, torn knees skinnies, any fucking top and a cheap binbag moto jacket.

>>12117347
i'd /fa/ck her

>>12117525
late 90s / early 2000s ironic bad taste is pretty basic bitch core