Should I cop?

>>12077537
It has a generic ETA movement and you're paying thousands for it.

>>12077539
I dont really care about the movement, I just like the look of it.

File: 1.jpg (75KB, 1024x684px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1024x684px

>>12077542
Then get something like a Seiko then if you aren't a brand whore.

File: 38832eb7-1fc2-421f-8911-a0f43b662ee5..jpg (32KB, 430x650px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 430x650px

>>12077566
There are a ton of inexpensive Tank styled watches out there to choose from.

File: 8e8ec098-a259-4f27-b4de-f4176e036c59..jpg (20KB, 240x342px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 240x342px

>>12077748

File: 9cbcd94f-e761-4932-ab37-a845caa6a852..jpg (71KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 900x900px

>>12077750
Pulsar Tank Watch, from one of Seiko's budget brands. Not a cheap as their low end Lorus brand, but essentially a fashion watch brand for Seiko.

File: f660216c-3e40-4e99-8ac3-f516ab9207c6..jpg (12KB, 280x280px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 280x280px

>>12077761
Even cheap ass Timex has a tank styled knockoff.

>>12077537
get the jlc you fucking mongrel

File: Reverso.jpg (129KB, 766x1024px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 766x1024px

>>12078037
Bought a Reverso for my gf last year, she loves it.

A Cartier is just disgusting.

get a yellow gold Santos.

>YEAR TWOTHOUSAND TWENTY.
>WEARING WATCHES.

>>12078060
fuck off nobody likes you or even find you funny

File: image.jpg (102KB, 840x770px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 840x770px

/fa/ approved for everyday casual use?

>>12078060
This moron posts this brain dead comment on every watch thread. Ignore him, he's just another fat loser, living in his parent's basement, jerking off to his shiny new iPhone!

>>12078037
>>12078055
Everyone says this but I find the Reverso to be so ugly.

>>12078056
Yellow gold is tacky.

>>12077748
and yet you're picking that disgusting piece of trash

>>12077566
This Seiko is the nicest one posted, however its a blatant copy of the Cartier Tank Louis. I would get the Cartier since they invented the tank design, the rest are just copys

>>12078432
I'm not picking anything, you moron. Just showing a variety of choices from different watch makers. If I were to get an inexpensive Tank styled watch, I'd probably go with the Seiko model.

>>12077537
nice

>>12078219
get a datejust tt
literal god-status watch
>>12078055
in general ya cartier is ew
but i love some of their 'exceptional pieces'

>>12078055
seems pretty pointless, I haven't met a women who actually cares about watch movements. They just want something that looks nice and quartz is more accurate/you don't have to wind it. On top of all that the reverso is pretty ugly, not many women would wear one.

what makes rectangle shaped more /fa/ than circle shaped?

>>12078219
Ugliest rolex watch. Get a oyster perpetual/datejust a lit bit small (34/36 mm depending how big you are).

>>12078397
You know that jlc makes a ton of different dials, if you like tanks you like reversos, you can buy both with roman numerals and stuff like that.

File: 1473218270587.jpg (261KB, 800x942px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 800x942px

>>12078219
superior everyday rolex

File: jaeger-lecoultre-reverso-classique-ostrich-1.jpg (274KB, 800x640px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 800x640px

>>12081851
They're not necessarily more effay, it just boils down to personal preference and things like the general aesthetics and proportions of the watch.

>>12077537
No, wait for Christmas and maybe your parents will buy you one.

File: mtps100-1bv_xlarge.jpg (106KB, 500x529px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 500x529px

looking for something similar but 100mm water resist. what do you recommend?

>>12082682
I meant 100m obviously, not mm

>>12082682
Check the seiko 5 line of watches. Some are 100m wr with a similiar style.