Winter Boots

ANSWER ME!

>>12060602
I WOULD ALSO LIKE ANSWERS

>>12060012
NOT BLUNDSTONES.

>>12060012
Where do you live? Those don't look that warm, but I'm used to super cold temps in winter

File: IMG_2672.jpg (130KB, 929x1072px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 929x1072px

Thoughts on the shearling lined bean boots?

>>12060859
THEYRE ALRIGHT. WARM.

>>12060012
Can somebody post a good fit with Blundmemes?

>>12060860
OK.

I want to be warm but I also don't want some ridiculously large boot I can't fit my pants over

>>12060859
They're ugly duckboots, and shearling is too warm, when you could just wear a thicker sock instead.
Gotta love the textured leather tho.

File: Blundstone_Steph_031.jpg (324KB, 601x900px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 601x900px

>>12060889
>Blundmemes

I love my blundstones, comfy and durable. I've had them for 3 years now.

Are all chelseas memes now or is it just blundstones?

I get that theyre comfy and well made, but they just look so blocky. Plus it doesnt look like the top would fit inside the legholes of slim pants, not just skinny ones.

>>12061447
>blocky
that´s what i like about them

>>12061447
>putting your pants over your shoes
>not tucking your pants into your shoes
?????????

File: 20161029_054655.jpg (1MB, 1000x1778px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1778px

>>12061476
>tucking pants into Chelsea's
do you want to look like this you fucking idiot

File: FullSizeRender 7.jpg (784KB, 2167x2348px) Image search: [Google]

784KB, 2167x2348px

>>12061447
my blundies look fine with acne skin 5 denim

>>12061506
>>12061530
just wear jeans with wider legs

File: IMG_2811 2.jpg (2MB, 2978x3125px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2978x3125px

>>12061506

File: IMG_1686.jpg (1MB, 2857x3643px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2857x3643px

>>12061535

File: IMG_3660.jpg (889KB, 3024x2873px) Image search: [Google]

889KB, 3024x2873px

>>12061538

>>12061543
No offense but this looks beta af. Don't do this

>>12061558
K nvm. But guys who do this look cringe af

>>12061552
im a girl so i don't really care about what looks beta desu

>>12061567
what? skinny jeans and chelsea's?

how is that beta?

just bought the converse chuck taylor allstar 2's and these things are a dream. insulted with this nike shit called Lunarlon -- what they use for wetsuits essentially. ultra comfy, water proof, and look sleek af

>>12060012
my dad wears these with 501's and it looks pretty cool actually.

>>12061578
Fuck off shill

>>12061506
>>12061484
>>12061538
The other issue is at least for me, the sides of chelseas are pretty ugly. Id prefer to cover some of the elastic part with the pants.

File: GOAT.jpg (31KB, 600x492px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x492px

They will cost an arm and a leg, and I'm def /ozposting/ but RM Williams are effay as a cunt and when I wore my super old and worn out pair in Europe they were perfectly warm

>>12060012

I've been wearing those exact Blundstones in Denver as casual boots. They have OK traction in the snow, but not great. Super comfortable after they've been broken in. They aren't particularly warm when temps get well below freezing.

>>12062361
Which model do you recommend, Craftsman or one of the others. Like for casual wearing with blue or black jeans?

>>12063208
Not the person you linked from but the craftsman is fine and a good general choice, however the Macquarie last is sleek as fuck and my personal favourite. Go with the comfort Macquarie with the rubber sole if you plan on frequent wears with lots of walking.

>>12061588
i like your dad

>>12060012
Blundstones are shit m8.
DNC.

They used to be good, now they'll last you maybe 6 months.
Less in a euro/merican winter.

Quality goes to shit when you close your aussie factories and outsource to asia to the place that'll make your shit for the cheapest price possible by cutting every corner that can be cut whilst still making something that still resembles in shape, a boot.

Damn right I'm still salty about this.

>>12063208
>>12063294
One thing about RM's and lasts and shit:
Make sure you try the fuckers on because though you may like the Macquarie last, your foot may not be fit for it.
Also: widths.

Don't just order your generic numerical size equivalent with proper footwear; they're not sneakers and don't stretch everywhere.

>>12062349
>the sides of chelseas are pretty ugly. Id prefer to cover some of the elastic part with the pants.
You could look at Jodhpurs, or buckle boots.

Resemble chelseas, but no pulltabs or elastic.

>>12061552
Really, it just looks beta because how thin his legs are.

>>12061506
Are your legs photoshopped?

I need boots to wear in Finnish -30°C weather

>>12063891
no why?

could be the angle of the mirror

File: serveimage8.jpg (47KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 900x900px

Bogs Turf Stomper work boots ($135, or $140 for steel toe model) with Thorlos steel toe socks ($14.50 a piece, buy three get one free for a limited time only)

http://www.bogsfootwear.com/shop/style/71401.html
https://www.thorlo.com/socks/wlst/004

The boots are made of rubber and do not have a heat trapping liner. The socks are made with acrylic and are the comfiest socks I've ever worn. They do a good job at trapping heat.

They got battle tested in Portland's (Oregon) recent snowstorms and worked well. I'm not white but I'm from Chicago, though I've not been there for a couple of years. If you've got the Nord genes I suppose this combo would work for you.