Where to get style glasses for cheap?

>>12058630
You won't get quality for less than $100. Try Warby Parker and fuck Ray-Ban.

>>12058894
Warby parker is shit

File: Tea Rose Fade Laurel.jpg (152KB, 1054x1362px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1054x1362px

>>12058894
warby parker is my shit, i love them, also something something luxottica owns 95% of american glasses and corners the market and drives up prices artificially so fuck them

OP here, do you guys know if I need the lenses to be exactly my type? Or do basic lenses work fine? I'm new to this

>>12058918

Nope. I have three pairs; they're all nice thick solidly made acetate frames. They come with good hard cases. Company donates to worthy charities.

Nice try tho.

>>12058943

What are you talking about? You need a valid prescription to order.

If you're thinking about buying non-prescription glasses just to pose in then GTFO.

>>12058943
you need to check your vision and get a prescription you fucking idiot

File: Cedric-Bob Seinfeld.png (213KB, 626x464px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 626x464px

w2C glasses that look like Cedric's

>>12058894
>what is eyebuydirect

File: face_.jpg (824KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 1440x2560px

Can anyone recommend some frame styles I should look into for my ugly mug's shape?

Don't skimp on your glasses, especially if you wear them every fucking day all the time

It's a pretty worthwhile investment

File: IMG_0144.jpg (32KB, 1400x736px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 1400x736px

>>12059540
Do you really pay attention to other peoples glasses? If you do, why? If you don't, why do you think others care about yours? I understand choosing the right lens shape for your face type, but beyond that... the differences between a £30 pair and a £300 pair seem minuscule. What are you actually paying for?

Pic related. I got two pairs of these for £50 total. I don't understand why I would pay much more unless I had some crazy prescription that required ridiculous lenses.

>>12059522
Honestly your face is a good general shape for glasses. Most styles will work for you.

>>12059611
You could say that about any product. Nicely designed, well made things are almost always disproportionately more expensive.

File: IMG_3906.jpg (23KB, 600x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 600x300px

>>12059611
same as what he said; you wear them everyday so why not spend a little more and get a quality pair

i'm waiting on my prescription to be filled for these rn pls no bully i really like them

>>12059611
Why are you on a fashion board if you don't care about how something you wear everyday on your face looks?

>>12059747
I like these

>>12059753
I consider glasses to be a functional tool first and foremost, with looks being a secondary consideration.

It's not that I don't care at all. There are some glasses that look horrible and I did make sure to select ones that worked with my face and had thin frames to avoid drawing attention to themselves.

What I don't get is why people are spending hundreds and hundreds of dollars for frames that look barely any different from <$50 ones. 99% of people who see you won't recognise the brand of your glasses or think twice about them provided they don't look terrible.

>>12059784
this is how i feel about oliver peoples but i'll still spend 1-200 on frames

>>12059710
Thanks anon. Doubt you're still here, but would you recommend any particular round glasses that suit my skin/hair?

>>12059243
shit thats what it is
(i have two pairs from them and theyre cheap looking)

File: Lantz_Dark_Havana_1024x1024.jpg (52KB, 1024x656px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1024x656px

i hate when i look up glasses and theres no stock picture with someone wearing them.

anyways i really like pic related but i don't want to drop $500 without trying them on even though i can return them if they don't fit but still sooo annoying