What do you guys think of the brand, as well as some of the other diffusion line shit (D by D, I think?).
Basically I wanted a pair of more casual sneakers instead of wearing (out) my one pair of Ramones everyday, so I thought I'd just get a decent pair of Converses or something, and then I came across this. Like Cinzia Araia, it's clearly a Ramones rip, except even cheaper. You guys think it'll be decent enough for normal wear? Anyone know if they run TTS?
As I don't mind brands like CA, if stuff like this is held in the same level of (lack of) esteem, I don't really mind, but I figured I'd ask you guys about it anyway.
(Also, to be honest there's a level of resistance to brands like D. Gnak or Juun J. since they're Koreans and I'm Japanese and they probably hate us or something, but I dunno, that's pretty petty, isn't it?)
Your not going to get much support here for d gnak
>>12038064
Yeah, I can see that, but they're still better than Converses…right?
>>12038051
>>12038225
nah dude, just get some chuck2s or chuck70s
literally high end gook zara
>>12038251
Any other ideas of what to get that serves the sort of purposes Converses do other than normal Cons? I've never been a super big fan of how they feel wearing them, and the leather ones feel super cheap.
It's like if Zara spent their entire time trying to copy Rick.
>>12038733
PF Flyers
Shoes Like Pottery
UniqloU
>>12038444
trips do NOT lie
>>12039143
>UniqloU
I thought Uniqlo only made Vans ripoffs for shoes?
>>12039196
They do have a new boot but even just looking at the pictures I would gauge build quality somewhere between Aldo and those foam flip flops you get at spas.
Still its certainly not visually offensive in any way, but granted I haven't seen it in person so who's to say.
The whites are a little better at a glance if you're into that kind of thing
>>12039242
>>12039244
Oof. They do not look nice. Seems really cheap.
>>12038051
They look a bit like cheap Geos. But as >>12038064 said you can't discuss any designers there. It's literally r/teenmfa now.
>>12040242
>It's literally r/teenmfa now.
Wait, are you for or against D. Gnak?
>>12041055
I don't own a piece, but from SSENSE it looks quite nice and reasonably priced. Just try it on if you have more gothic/darker warderobe.
>>12038051
https://www.ssense.com/en-us/men/designers/dgnak-by-kangd
lol is this bootleg rick
>>12041134
It basically is, isn't it?
>>12039242
>>12039244
>>12039913
way better on-foot
>>12039437
>>12041216
>>12041442