Sneakers with formal wear

>>12002795
looks really silly and childish desu.

>>12002795
Can anyone ID all these

imo it can work but rarely, with neutral colors only

>>12002795
absolutely unacceptable. This triggers the fuck out of me every time I see it and I see it at work pretty often during the Summer.

>>12002795
This was cool for about 2 weeks in 2008, its retarded now

>>12002795
with just trousers ok but with a whole suit no

I don't thin it looks bad so long as you're not wearing a tie, and you leave the jacked unbottoed. What triggers me the most is big huge meat heads in suits/sneaker combo and skinny ass trousers!!

>>12002846

>absolutely unacceptable

alright, easy there

sorry senpai it will never look good period.

File: photos (5).jpg (164KB, 800x1102px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 800x1102px

>>12002795
not an awful idea but is seldom well put together because its a common trope of pinterest tier garbage

>>12003888

Nobody in this picture is wearing a suit with sneakers.

>>12003888
None of that is formal wear, unless you're underage and consider anything other than jorts and jeans formal wear.

>>12003891
>>12003920
i thought someone was wearing formalwear in the photo with sneakers in the thumbnail but it seems i chose the wrong picture
soz i aint got anything

File: KIM_0187.jpg (686KB, 2000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 2000x3000px

Works really well if its a casual suit and you skip all the formal pieces. Read: no fucking tie, no handkerchief, no belt, should probably not even button up, no formal texture or the material. See pics as examples.

File: MEN-SS15-17_0.jpg (208KB, 960x1440px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 960x1440px

>>12005090

>>12005090
This works

>>12005095
>>12002795
These don't.

Far left in OP's pic minus the jacket would look great. The problem is like the other anon said, all formal parts need to be removed. In addition to that, more formal colors such as black and dark blue won't work either.
Here are some theoretical fits that would look decent
>Black trousers + white sneakers + white cotton shirt + no jacket
>Grey trousers & jacket + black tee + white sneakers
>Grey trousers + black sweater + white or black sneakers
>Blue trousers + white tee + white sneakers
>Blue trousers + grey sweater + white or black sneakers

>>12005163
>formal colors such as [...] dark blue
Simply wrong. Thats all I have to say.

>>12005179
I meant relatively formal. As in it won't work as well in a casual fit. Navy blue appears too rigid and businesslike.

>>12005191
If thats what you were going for then you should probably have listed charcoal instead because its way more formal than a dark blue (even navy) suit could ever be. I never wear my dark blue pieces with sneakers either, though. Usually its with derbies. Dark blue itself works perfectly fine in a casual fit, it really is more about the way you wear it. But of course youre right in saying that it appears less "casual" than lets say a red or petrol suit/blazer because neither would ever be worn in business environments. Jacket and presentation are what make a look formal, and as you can see in that picture the jacket doesnt only lack a chest pocket, it also lacks cuffs. The color itself doesnt suddenly turn this extremely stylized jacket into something that resembles formal attire. Then again, it also doesnt really resemble something that can be worn with any form of sneaker, so youre probably right in that regard. It can only be worn with that sort of sneakers shown in the fit, otherwise the shoes would probably look completely out of place.

File: , wings-horn-dayton-brown-boot.jpg (45KB, 540x271px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 540x271px

>>12002795

classic shoes would ALWAYS look better

and fuck wearing jeans with a blazer also