Can metalheads be /fa/?

File: Metalhead1.jpg (63KB, 350x467px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 350x467px

>>11989897
yeah defiantly. i just think a lot of metal heads over do it though like in the pic related. OPs pic is a good example

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KesAaLs7NvQ

File: 9a36aa0295854504ba3d9cb3e8a4696d.jpg (75KB, 770x858px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 770x858px

ya

>>11989897
Nah. Metal is lowest form of music along with rap

>>11990391

>rap not effay

https://youtu.be/KVaMncHHCDc?t=50

>>11989897
Yeah can be but most arent

yes only a certain subgenre, i wont tell you what it is because there's already enough trendies in it and we dont need more

>>11990483
Good anon yeah we dont want you fashion fags to try to make our shit part of your faggy trends

>>11990492
unfortunately, if we're thinking of the same thing, it started a few years ago when faggots who couldn't stand the real shit adopted the easy listening version. why do posers have to ruin the things I like?

Metal isnt about being fashionable.

Thats like asking if women can be pure.

>>11991033
Wtf does that even mean

>>11990387
W2c pants like this

>>11990483
>>11990492
>>11990503
Death metal: the new 'My music scares people xD xD xD' for 12 year olds and edgy /fit/ guys

>>11991219
he's done with metal

Post /fa/ metalheads

>>11990387
thats a nice ass

>>11991377
Early death metal isn't really bad. It's Cannibal Corpse and other bands like them that are shit. Anybody who shoves their musical tastes down people's throats are idiots in general.

>>11989897
WHO

>>11991377
nope, I'm not a wigger.

File: neuroza.jpg (69KB, 770x516px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 770x516px

>>11989897
yeah, but certain genres or scenes are much better than the most popular image of "that drunk death / black metal headbanger"

/fa metalheads are most easy to find in post-metal / sludge / experimental scenes and the key to success is to not overdo the band merch thingy and to fullfill general basics of taking care of yourself

File: GracePerry.jpg (79KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 500x333px

Of course

>>11993225
are you trying to imply that anyone in that picture is even remotely fashionable?